Community Development District

KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

NOTICE OF BOARD OF SLIDERVISORS MEETING

Thursday, September 21,2017 @ 8:30 a.m.

TO BE HELD AT:

Key Marco Community Center 505 Whisky Creek Drive Marco Island, Florida 34145

C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D i s t r i c t
Board of Supervisor's Regular Meeting September 21, 2017 at 8:30 a.m.
505 Whiskey Creek Drive Marco bland, FL 34145

AGENDA (Revised)

Note: Requests to address the Board on WI subjects, which are not or today's agenda,
*Hi be accommodated under "Public Comments”

Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining there to and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of these proceedings is made at their expense.

Any person requiring special accommodation at this meeting because of a disability of physical impairment should comet the District Office at 239-394-4346 at least five days prior to the meeting.

Call to Order
Oath of Office — New Supervisor
Roll CO
Approval of Agenda
Audience Questions and Comments on Agenda Items
Approval of August 24, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes
Specific items of Old Business
Specific Items of New Business
Staff Reports;
District Counsel — No Report
District Consultant — No Report

1 P a g e

e. District Manager Katie Maine
Request for Approval for the lowest and responsible bidder for Accounting Services for the COD Severn Trent — Annually $14,350
Earthview — Clean all catch basins and culverts a5: recommended by Johnson Engineering T&M Budget Not to Exceed $10,000
Supervisions Request and Comments
Financial Report
a Financial I Statement ending July 30, 2017
Audience Questions and Comments
Schedule Next Meeting Date 8nd Time
Adjournment

2  Page3

KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
2017-2018 BUDGET HEARING AND REGULAR BOARD MEETING
AUGUST 24, 2017

The Board of Supervisors of the Key Marco Community Development District met at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, August 24, 2017, at the Key Marco Community Center, Marco Island, Florida.

APPEARANCES:

ALSO PRESENT:	Maureen McFarland, Chairman/Treasurer
Johanna Parkes, Supervisor/Assistant Secretary (Via Speakerphone) Corrie Grado Supervisor/Assistant Secretary
Patty Quartuccio, Supervisor/ Assistant Secretary Katie Maline, Manager
Greg Urbancic, District Counsel
Neil Dorrill, Dorrill Management Group	

ROLL CALL/APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mrs. McFarland indicated that a quorum was in attendance, and Mrs. Maline indicated that that the meeting had been properly noticed on August 4 and August 18.
Three Board members were in attendance, and Mrs. Parkes was participating via speakerphone.
On a MOTION by Mrs. Grado and a second by Mrs. Quartuccio, the Agenda as presented was unanimously approved by the Board.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Earlywine addressed the Boar, noting that he was present on behalf of Gerry Tsandoulas who was also in attendance. (Inaudible comments.) Mr. Earlywine had some comments  related to item 9A, which will be addressed when that item comes up under Supervisors Requests and Comments.

APPROVAL OF MAY 11, 2017 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
On a MOTION by Mrs. Quartuccio and a second by Corrie Grado, the minutes were unanimously approved by the Board.

SPECIFIC ITEMS OF OLD BUSINESS
There were no items noted to be discussed under Old Business.

SPECIFIC ITEMS OF NEW BUSINESS
A., B. Resignation of Richard Perry/Appointment of New Supervisor
An email was received from Richard Perry resigning as supervisor. Mr. Urbancic indicated that when there is a resignation, pursuant to Florida Statutes the Board has the authority to appoint  a supervisor for the balance of the term. However the Board wishes to do that, then, they have the authority.
Mrs. Grado then made a MOTION to appoint Mary Beth ***Schewitz to fill the vacated  chair for the balance of the term. Mrs. Quartuccio seconded the Motion, which was unanimously approved.
Mrs. McFarland then note that Mrs. Schewitz is presently traveling, as is Mrs. Parkes. Mr. Perry   is also away from Key Marco. This continues to be a problem as many Key Marco residents do travel quite a bit, and a quorum is necessary at meetings. She asked for anyone who is  interested in serving on the Board and can commit to being at the meeting to advise her. Mary Beth Schewitz will be sworn in at the next meeting, and Mr. Perry will be provided with the appropriate documents for resignation. Mrs. Maline indicated that Mr. Perry had received those documents and they have been mailed in to the state, and M rs. Schewitz will be provided with the necessary documents to serve as a member of the Board as well.

STAFF REPORTS
District Counsel
Resolution 2017-05
This item amends Resolution 2017-04 which set a hearing for August 17 on the budget, but due to a quorum issue the meeting was not able to be convened. August 24 was then advertised as the public hearing, and this Resolution essentially is resetting the public hearing and ratifying  the actions of the manager to do so.
On a MOTION by Mrs. Grado and a second by Mrs. Quartuccio, the Board unanimously approved Resolution 2017-04 changing the date of the public hearing and regular meeting to August 24th.

Resolution 2017-06
In doing some housekeeping and checking some of the older records of Key Marco it was discovered that this District does not have a Defense Resolution, which should have been adopted at the time the District was formed. A Defense Resolution basically says that the Board can stand behind the various supervisors and officers of the District i f they are sued.

There are exclusions to this, for example, if you were to commit a tort, or if you were to do something that was not within the scope of your duties or not for a public purpose. The  Defense Resolution is very broad, and was read into the record by Mr. Urba ncic, as follows: A Resolution setting forth the policy of Key Marco Community Development District Board of Supervisors with regard to the support and legal defense of the Board of Supervisors and District officers, and provide an effective date.
It is recommended for Board approval.
Mrs. McFarland noted that they would like it to include former supervisors as well as existing, because if people in the community are going to volunteer and give their best efforts, the District should support them in this re gard. Mr. Urbancic checked the Statute and determined that it also covers former Board members.
On a MOTION by Mrs. Grado and a second by Mrs. Quartuccio, Resolution 2017-06 providing support and legal defense to former and existing Board members was unanimously approved by the Board.
Mr. Dorrill asked about Mrs. Parkes' participation, and Mrs. McFarland felt that she would not  be able to vote. Mr. Urbancic indicated that typically they do allow the phone participation to include voting on Key Marco. He suggested that some boards will memorialize that with a motion, and if this Board wished to make that clear for the record, it would be a good idea. Mrs. Parkes advised that she could not make out anyone's questions or comments, and they only person she could hear properly was Mrs. McFarland. For that reason she did not feel she could vote as she would not be sure what she was voting on.
After a brief discussion, it was agreed that the phone would be passed to the speakers so Mrs. Parkes would have a clearer idea of what was taking place. Mr. Urbancic asked Mrs. Parkes to confirm that she could hear him as he spoke to her, and that she would not have a problem participating if they followed that process. Mrs. Parkes agreed.
On a MOTION by Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Grado, the Board unanimously agreed that Mrs. Parkes could participate fully by phone with the voting at this CDD meeting.

Amended and Restated District Management Agreement with Dorrill Management Group This item related to the restated agreement with Dorrill Management, and it was Mr. Urbancic's recollection that the Board authorized him to move forward with this. He was not sure, however, that it was ever executed. Mrs. Maline indicate d that it was approved at the March 11 meeting, but never signed.
Mr. Urbancic indicated that if it has already been approved, then it was not necessary to

re-approve it. His recommendation that it be executed will be part of the record today. The only other aspect of this agreement is that the term of it may be coming to a close, so that will need   to be addressed. Mr. Dorrill noted that recently the Chairman had asked him if he would be willing to extend the agreement for an additional fiscal year. The original agreement  contemplated a six month extension, and this would be on an as -needed, consultation basis  going into the new fiscal year.
Mrs. Maline had asked for a new proposal from Mr. Dorrill, and Mrs. McFarland will sign the new agreement.

District Consultant
Mr. Dorrill advised that he had nothing to report other than he had coordinated a number of business items with Mrs. Maline in advance, and in particular action must be taken on acceptance of the audit for 2016, and later in the meeting some issues related to the next year's budget will be addressed.

District Manager
i. Johnson Engineering Pavement Condition Report
This report was provided to the Board members, and indicated that there were several items that needed to be completed in 2017, along with a study of the rest of the roads and what they would need to have done in the future.
Several of these projects have already bee n lined up by Mrs. Maline, and once firm, qualified bids are obtained they will be brought back to the Board for a vote of approval. That work, once approved, will be done in fiscal year 2018.
Mr. Krutisch has looked through the report and had two comments , one regarding the drainage problems in certain areas of the roadways. Johnson Engineering recommended that the turf be lowered so the water can roll over it more readily. Mr. Krutisch noted that a similar situation existed in front of Mr. Midkiff's home, and the solution suggested by Johnson Engineering was tried and did not work. In this case removing the turf from the roadway edge reduced its  stability and the street edges have now completely deteriorated. If the grass is higher than the edge of the roadway it give is some stability. Mr. Krutisch's recommendation would be to   remove the turf in certain sections where the drains are located, and to perhaps replace the stones or gravel with something else so it does not flow away so quickly.
The second item in the engineering report that Mr. Krutisch noted would be to divide Blue Hill Creek between the western and eastern parts, with the eastern part being the last step as

there is less traffic there and it is in much better shape than the western side. Blue Hill Creek  is in much better shape than Whiskey Creek, which has much more traffic and much more moisture in the ground near the roadway.
Mrs. Grado noted that in some places , Hideaway for instance, they have built up the areas  where the grass meets the tarmac, and a gutter is put in place to divert the water. Mr. Krutisch has seen those, and agreed that they are good but much more expensive than his option. Mrs. McFarland noted that they also recommend silt fences to keep the gopher tortoises from   crossing the streets, but Mr. Krutisch indicated that this option was only for the construction phase.
Mr. Dorrill pointed out a schedule 2 on the report which is the engineer's schedule of probable costs, and the recommendation is for about $43,000 worth of work to construct concrete flow ways or spill ways to get the water down into the retention area. This is conte mplated for next year. Mrs. Grado asked about how this would fit into the budget, and whether it would be less expensive to do a good bit of the work now. The biggest portion of work would be about
$200,000 first, and then $600, 000 in 2020 and 21, with th e total being $1,500,000 through 2036.
Mrs. McFarland suggested that a committee be put together of people who would have the necessary understanding and expertise, including Mrs. Maline, as this would be a massive infrastructure improvement for the commun ity. She appealed to the engineers who were present to give an opinion on how best to address this, and Kevin Kerins suggested that the committee look at what needs to be done and then prioritize it, and look at the need to have projects as opposed to the want to have projects. He added that if the necessary work is done now, perhaps some of the other suggested work would not have to be done.
Mrs. McFarland asked Mrs. Maline if she would be willing to spearhead or coordinate this project for the community, and Mrs. Maline indicated that she would sit down and review   it with Mr. Kerins, who agreed to that, and with other experts in the field who live in the community.

li Policy Relating to the Use of District Counsel
While there has been a policy in place addressing this item, it was determined to be necessary  to change certain items. It was important that all District supervisors be aware that they can contact Mr. Urbancic if they have an immediate concern or question . The previous policy did  not permit that. The only caveat is that they advise Mrs. Maline that they have done so to    make it easier to keep the billing straight. Mrs. Maline can also contact Mr. Urbancic if

she needs to, and will copy Mrs. McFarland on these contacts.
Mr. Urbancic noted that the existing resolution which was done in 2013 would then have to be amended, and he will get that to Mrs. Maline.
A MOTION was then made by Mrs. Grado and seconded by Mrs. Quartuccio to amend the 2013 Resolution to allow the individual supervisors and Mrs. Maline to contact Mr. Urbancic with anything of immediate concern, and to then advise Mrs. Maline or Mrs. McFarland so an accurate record can be kept of changed. The Motion passed unanimously.

Adoption of the Key Marco CDD Public Records Policy
A policy has not been in place on this issue, and should simply state that the Florida Constitution and Public Records Law provide the right to inspect and copy records unless specifically exempted. This policy will be put in place, and will be as follows:
If anyone has a request for records, they should first contact Mrs. Maline who will reply to them  by acknowledging that the request was received, and ask for clarification on what is being requested if necessary. If she does not have the requested document she will refer them to the record custodian, and further she will provide  an estimate to them of what the copies will cost  per page, administrative time, and clerical time. She will also provide estimated fees so the requesting party can determine if they want the records or not. The policy is posted on the website, and a copy of it will be provided to anyone by Mrs. Maline upon request.
Mrs. Maline will also get copies of  the  States policy on  public records, which are very similar  to what Key Marco is putting in place. Copies will be 15 cents apiece, and Mrs. Maline's time and costs gathering the information will also follow the State guidelines. Mr. Urbancic advised the Board that the costs are statutory, and must be followed, and additionally there are only certain times when administrative costs can be charged. All requests w ill be evaluated to determine if those costs will apply. Mr. Urbancic added that there is not a  clear benchmark as  to determining costs and when they should apply, as the requirements change and are driven by case law. It really depends on the scope of the records request and how long it will take to respond to the request.
The exemptions to record requests have to be looked at, and there are also cases where you cannot charge people for certain things. All of that has to be looked at, and Mr. Urbancic felt that Mrs. Maline has already done a number of these request and was fairly good at determining how long something was going to take.
Mrs. McFarland advised that they have read through the statute on this issue, and Mrs. Maline found the governor's policy on it as well. They will be following the governor's policy, as that

Key Marco CDD — Minutes August 24, 2017
Page 7

office must follow the statutes as well. Mr. Urbancic reminded them that whatever the costs are, they are, as they are statutorily driven, so there is no question there.
A MOTION was made by Mrs. Grado and seconded by Mrs. Quartuccio to approve the policy as outlined, and unanimously approved.

Key Marco Triathlon Request for Approval — October 1, 2017
The insurance certificates have been received for this event, and once permission is received from the Board for them to run through Key Marco on the date noted above, the deposit of $250 will be collected.
Mrs. McFarland reminded the Board of the previous organization's failure to remove the paint that was sprayed on the streets for the triathlon last year, and indicated that no property can   be defaced, including paint on the roadways. Mrs. Maline has made t his very clear to the triathlon organizers, and added for the record that the deposit from last year was not returned  to the event organizers. Mrs. McFarland suggested that the deposit be increased so there will  be incentive not to deface Key Marco in any way.
Mr. Urbancic's recollection was that the Board had adopted a resolution on access to the community for special events. That should be checked to make sure that any action the Board takes coincides with what is in that resolution, which can be modified at the discretion of the Board.
After a brief discussion, a MOTION was made by Mrs. Grado to increase the $250 deposit amount for the special event from $250 to $1,000.
Mrs. Parkes asked what the $1,000 amount was based on, and whether this amount was necessary to repair the damage from the last race. Mrs. Grado indicated that it took six months to get the paint off the roadways, which had to be done by Key Marco as the event
coordinators would not come back to fix it. This amount would give them the incentive to leave Key Marco the way they found it, as there was also quite a bit of litter left behind. Mrs.
McFarland felt that the increase was not as much based on what it cost to cl ean things up, but  it was an incentive for  people to respect the  Key Marco property. Mrs. Parkes indicated that  this made sense to her.
The Motion was then seconded by Mrs. Quartuccio and unanimously approved by the Board. A resident asked if the removal of signs would be part of the requirements, as the previous year it took quite some time before the signs were taken down. Mrs. Maline indicated that they will make sure that the signs are removed. Mrs. Grado added that the porta -potty also remained on   Key Marco for a while, and Mrs. Maline will make sure that the contract includes the

requirement for immediate removal of all signs and portable toilets after the triathlon is over.

Board approval of 2017-2018 Key Marco CDD Proposed Meeting Schedule
The CDD meetings will be scheduled for the third Thursday of each month at 8:30 a.m. This information has also been posted on the website. These are proposed meetings only, and Mrs. Maline will keep the information updated and posted.
Mr. Urbancic indicated that the Board should officially adopt that schedule, and on a MOTION by Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Grado, the Board unanimously approved the meeting schedule as proposed.

Request for Approval for Lowest and Responsible Bidders for the following:
Bridge and Sidewalk repairs- Quality Enterprises - $13,723.75
Mrs. Maline asked for approval from the Board to sign this contract, which is for work that was recommended by the  engineer, including the wobbling concrete slabs, the  replacement of an expansion joint, and two sidewalk repairs. Mrs. McFarland briefly explained the engineer's report, a copy of which is available to anyone who is interested. With the upkeep of the bridge, its estimated continued life is 75 years.
In response to a question from Mrs. Parkes the previous month, Mrs. Maline indicated that the maximum weight for the bridge is 36 tons, which was confirmed by DOT. Most vehicles, including the big 18-wheel trucks, are no more than 22 tons.
On a MOTION by Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Grado, the Board unanimously approved the Bridge and Sidewalk repair by Quality Enterprises.

Aggressive Vine Removal-Crawford Landscaping - $10,400
This removal will also include the vine roots, and Mrs. Maline suggested that this work should be part of the annual budget. Mr. Krutisch asked when this work will be done, and was advised that it will be done right away once it is approved by the Board. Mr. Krutisch wondered if it could wait until the end of April or May, which is the end of the dry season, and most of the vines will be weaker and easier to remove. Additionally, it may be less expensive at that point. Mrs. Maline felt that as some of the vines are out of control now,    it may be best to address the problem immediately.
Dana ***Molback asked if the trees on both sides of the roadway would be cleaned up, as   a  large oak directly across from their home is covered with vines that are killing the   foliage. She was advised that all of the trees would be taken care of.

On a MOTION by Mrs. Grado and a second by Mrs. Quartuccio, the Board unanimously approved the immediate removal of the vines in the trees on Key Marco by Crawford Landscaping.
Vine removal will be a regular budget item on an ongoing basis.

Gatehouse Roof Replacement — Robert Kettelle Roofing - $14,550
Mrs. Maline asked for approval of this work so it can be placed on the schedule for   October. The same roof tile that is presently on the community center will be used, which is a  concrete tile as opposed to terra cotta which is no longer available. In resp onse to  Mrs. Grado's concern about the tiles cracking when they are walked on during cleaning,  Mrs. Maline indicated that in the future all cleaning will be done from a cherry picker. It was suggested that as there will be some changes to the interior of t he community center in the near future, they Board may want to consider a  different style of roofing for the   gate house roof which can be installed at the community center in the future.
Mrs. Grado noted that if the community center roof was redone sometime in the next few years, would they Board consider a metal roof in the terra cotta color, as Key Marco's look does need to be upgraded.
Mrs. Maline suggested that they approve the work, and she will then have the contractor bring some other options for the Board to look at. Mrs. McFarland asked if this item could wait until the next meeting in September, and Mr. Krutisch added that the roof work    should not be done during the rainy season. The Board then agreed that this would be put on the agenda for the following month, when more options for roofing could be looked at and a different look for Key Marco could be considered.

Insurance Renewal — PRIA $27,658
This insurance covers inland marine, general liability, automobile liability, physical damage, Workman's Comp and Public Officials Employment Practices Liability. An  attempt was made to put this item out to bid, but the insurance companies that were contacted indicated that they needed anywhere between 60 and 100 days prior to the renewal date to prepare a quote. PRIA is the same company the District has been using for at least eight years, and their premiums fell under budget.
While this renewal comes due on October first, Mrs. McFarland would like to compare the proposal to those of the last couple of years. PRIA has been an excellent company for the District, and the costs have gone down, but she wished to make sure that the coverage

had not changed and that no terms had been changed. As a f ormer insurance agent, Mrs. Maline felt that perhaps Rick could give them some input on it as well. Mrs.
Maline indicated that the insurance renewal had to be signed by September 14th in order for it to be effective on October first.
Mrs. McFarland suggested that they call their agent just to make sure everything is as it should be, and in the meantime perhaps the Board can approve the renewal subject to confirming that the coverage is exactly as it was the previous year. Mrs. Grado as ked if a month's extension on the policy could be  obtained, but  apparently insurance  companies do not offer that. Mr. Dorrill suggested that the Board could cancel the policy if necessary after approving its renewal today for a minimum amount of money. On a MOTION by  Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Grado, Mrs. Maline was unanimously authorized to proceed with the PRIA insurance renewal subject to the confirmation that there have been no changes in the levels or exclusions of the coverage.
Mrs. Maline and Mrs. McFarland will get together and go through the policy with the insurance agent on the phone. Rick will also be asked to participate in this call.

Mrs. McFarland also noted that there are four streetlights that are out and need to be fixed, and Mrs. Maline gave a brief summary of their history, noting that they were converted from standard lighting and poles to decorative lights at the time they were converted to LEDs. The problem is with the style of light they are using in the fixtures, and they are continuing to burn out. The solution has not been found yet, but the electrician is taking a bulb apart to determine why they keep shorting out, and will let the Board know what the issue is. Mrs.  Maline asked that she be notified by email if anyone se es that another bulb has shorted out.

This t issue related to the Fire -Wise situation, and Mrs. McFarland noted that this item has been discussed at the last two meetings, but asked Mrs. Maline to summarize those findings.  The Marco Island Fire Chief did a ride through at Key Marco, and agreed with Mr. Tsandoulas' that there was a  fire on Key Marco at one point and the valves to turn the water on could not    be found. That has been corrected, and all the fire hydrants have been inspected and are up to date. In addition, the Forestry Division came to Key Marco and after going through the neighborhood indicated that they felt the neighborhood was very fire wise.
Mrs. Maline has arranged for the Forestry Division to come to the October meeting to talk to the
residents on how to fire wise their homes and what to do in the event of a fire.

SUPERVISORS' REQUESTS AND COMMENTS
A. Discussion of CDD Dissolution and Vote
At the last meeting which was held in May, Mrs. McFarland made a presentation to those in attendance regarding the dissolution of the CDD. She and Mr. Midkiff had spent the previous year reviewing the status of the CDD for Key Marco, which was established by one of the developers of Key Marco in order to issue bonds to help fund the infrastructure of Key Marco. Those bonds were paid off in December of 2013.
The decision was made to see if a CDD was still needed at Key Marco, and whether it made sense to have the expenses of two boards when the HOA Board only would suffice. The pros  and cons of having a  CDD were discussed in detail at the May meeting and the Supervisors  were encouraged to look through the relevant statutes. The question before the Board to day is whether to continue with the idea of dissolving the CDD.
There will not be a vote at this meeting on dissolving the CDD, but given the feedback from various members of the community, Mrs. McFarland felt that the consensus is that dissolving the CDD does make sense to the community, and the pros outweighed the cons.
The Board members were asked what their feelings were as to dropping the idea or continuing forward. Mrs. Grado felt that they should continue forward with the idea of dissolving the CDD, and one of the main reasons in her mind was the difficulty of getting volunteers to serve on either board, that it would make better financial sense, and she felt that the community in general agreed that it was time to move forward with only one board.
Mrs. McFarland agreed, reminding those present that with two boards there are two sets of financial statements, two treasurers, two websites, and less than 30 homes with only half being full time. It is a cumbersome arrangement for this small community.
Mr. Kerins stated that it was his understanding that the only reason a CDD Board was created was to float the bonds, and now that they are gone, the CDD was not necessary. He also felt that the cost of the CDD is close to $100,000, and that money could certain ly be used elsewhere. He agreed that it is a big burden on the small community.
One of the recommendations received from a community member was to get a report from the auditor, Grau and Associates, on their estimate of the annual costs for a CDD. Mrs. McF arland noted that every year the costs change, and in the three estimates she has obtained it is between $65,000 and $85,000 a year.
Mr. Krutisch pointed out for the record that the Homeowner's Association also has costs because    of the CDD, such as the question of security, as under the CDD the roads are public and there are people in and out all the time, using the dock, going in and out of the Horr house, and

making Key Marco less secure against crime. (inaudible section.) (Mr. Midkiff's comments were inaudible.)
Mrs. Quartuccio agreed that the CDD should be dissolved, and added that she was surprised when she moved to Key Marco to discover that there were two separa te Boards. In all probability the bridge will be good for another 75 years, and if it must be replaced, there are several other options other than bonds for funding a large infrastructure repair or replacement.  A CDD is the preferred vehicle for a  develope r, but for an HOA community, there are other  ways to fund. (Overtalk,)
Mrs. Parkes agreed with many of the arguments for dissolving the CDD, but she did have a concern about the potential legal liabilities, and further discussion should be had with the attorney. She added that they did not want to create a situation where they found themselves involved in a  legal battle for years to come, which would hurt the community. She added that  as many residents as possible should be involved in the final decision, b ut she is for continuing to look at this. Mrs. McFarland agreed, and indicated that they will continue to look at the    whole issue very carefully, and do their due diligence as far as making this decision.
Mrs. McFarland added that they have met with expert attorneys in this field of law, and dissolution of CDDs to her knowledge is not something that there have been legal decisions on. Mrs. Parkes wanted to make sure that the Board does everything possible to investigate what potential liability there might be, and Mrs. McFarland agreed completely.
(Inaudible comment by Mr. *****)
Mrs. McFarland felt that it would important to have expert counsel present when these discussions were held. The $25,000 that the Board allotted for legal research has been spent by Mrs. McFarland and Mr. Midkiff, which is why the attorney is not present a t the meeting. Mrs.
McFarland then asked if anyone had anything further to say before the Board made the decision on whether to pursue this issue or not. She noted that this was the appropriate time in the CDD meeting to state opinions and ask questions, a nd encouraged everyone present who had an opinion or a question to please use this time to do so.
A resident asked how much opposition there was to the dissolving of the CDD, and Mrs. McFarland indicated that they had received notice from one lot owner and two homeowners that they were opposed to it.
(Mr. Tsandoulas' and Mr. Earlywine's comments were inaudible.) (Overtalk)
Mr. Tsandoulas and his counsel were asked to speak at this time as it was designated for comments from the audience. They declined to speak.
Mr. Urbancic indicated that it was Mr. Earlywine's comments at the previous meeting about

To the extent the Board is going to move forward, there would be a series of resolutions that the Board is going to consider, and that Mr. Earlywine would like to see those resolutions and what they say so that he could comment on them.
Mr. Krutisch noted that the overwhelming majority response to the issue of dissolving the CDD was positive to move forward with it, and he was not sure that this statement by Mr. Earlywine was meant as general opposition, because there was a statement that if all the points on Mr. Tsandoulas' email were true„ then (inaudible)
Mrs. McFarland noted that she had also gotten a very professional email from Michael
***Recton the previous day, asking the Board to wait on the vote for dissolution, as he would like to have more information about it before the Board makes the informed decision. She appreciated that professional email that he sent, which was one of the three that Mrs.
McFarland counted questioning the dissolution. Mrs. ***Recton also wrote an email several months ago asking for some issues to be addressed, which was received by Mrs. McFarland and Mrs. Grado.
Mr. Krutish also spoke about the ongoing problem with the unlimited access the general public had to Key Marco, often to the detriment of the property rights of the r esidents. Not only have people come through his property to see the bay, but they go through the house on Horr's Island and use the marina, which is private property as well.
Mrs. McFarland reiterated that it was always good to get people's opinions, to have them addressed in an open forum where they could be considered and addressed. At the next meeting she was hopeful that counsel could attend and walk those present through the timing  of the dissolution of the CDD.
Mrs. McFarland then asked for a vote of the supervisors as to whether they should move forward with the process of the dissolution of the CDD. She reiterated that there will not be a vote on the dissolution itself today; that would be a formal vote to be held at a later time. A MOTION was then made by Mrs. Grado and second by Mrs. Quartuccio to move forward with the process of dissolution of the CDD.
Mrs. Parkes indicated that she did not fully understand the Motion, and Mr. Urbancic explained that the gist of the Motion was not the final appro val of dissolution, but only for authorizing  Mrs. McFarland and Mr. Midkiff to proceed forward with bringing the plan forward. There will    be a series of resolutions that will happen at a later stage, but at this point Mrs. McFarland is ascertaining if there is still interest from the Board to move forward with the process.
The Board members then unanimously approved the Motion.

FINANCIALS
Board Approval of Voiding Check 3234
Mr. Dorrill advised the Board that this was a housekeeping matter where after discussion it was agreed that an old receivable which was in anticipation of some trimming and pruning costs should be written off. The Treasurer and Mr. Dorrill are both recommending that the Board authorize the write off of that amount of $7,825.
On a MOTION by Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Grado, the Board unanimously approved the voiding of Check number 3234 in the amount of $7,825.

C. D. Review of Financials
The April, May and June Financials were included for the Board, and Mr. Dorrill asked them to look ahead to the most recent ones from June.
As of the end of the third quarter, June 30, there was $1,044,000 in cash against $69,000 in payables. The statement of revenue and expenses showed almost $70,000 coming in during    the month of June, a reflection of the proceeds from the tax sale conducted  by the tax  collector. There were no unsold certificates for this year, and 100 percent of revenue has been received through the end of June. All of the cost centers were included, and Mr. Dorrill noted that Mrs. Maline kept excellent track of the various c osts incurred thus far this year, with total expenditures in all categories being $40,000 under budget year -to-date.
The overall coordination between Dorrill Management and the Key Marco Chairman who also functions as the treasurer has also been satisfactory year-to-date.
Mr. Krutisch asked about the $129,000 in cash received which will be used for the remaining months of the fiscal year, which means that there will be no deposits made into the reserves. He was concerned about this as the report from Johnso n Engineering showed quite of work is necessary on the roadways. He felt that the Board needed to pay special attention to the reserves. Mrs. McFarland agreed, and indicated that they had addressed that in the upcoming budget.
On a MOTION by Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Grado, the financials were then unanimously accepted by the Board.

E. Board Approval of the Audited Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2016 For purposes of forwarding the Annual Audited Report to the State, Mr. Dorr ill asked for approval of the report, and noted that he was very happy with Grau and Associates, which specialize in CDD public accounting. In their letter to management they indicated that once

again the 2016 audit for Key Marco was a clean one, with no findings of conditions and no recommendations of existing financial emergencies Their review of internal controls and compliance issues were all clean, which were specifically outlined on Page 26 of the audit. Mr. Dorrill suggested that the Board may find it interesting to review the management discussion analysis that was separately prepared.
Additionally, looking at some of the footnotes and schedules, Note 5 showed a slight decline in
the total assets of the District, all attributable to depreciation on the infrastructure.
.
Mrs. McFarland agreed that Grau and Associates was doing a very good job for them and she is
pleased with them as well. They are very responsive to questions and they are charging much less than the District has paid in the past.
On a MOTION by Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Quartuccio, the independent audit was unanimously accepted by the Board.

PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF PROPOSED 2017/2018 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
Mr. Dorrill opened the public hearing for final consideration and formal adoption of the general fund budget for the 2018 fiscal year. Copies were provided to the Board members and some suggested changes have been made since it was initially reviewed and approved in May. Once questions have been taken from the public, two resolutions will be adopted to formally adopt the budget and associated assessment roll.
Mr. Dorrill provided a few quick highlights of the budget to those present, noting that in recognition of the road analysis and the bridge analysis, there are some proposed major capital improvements contemplated for the coming year. Additionally there are some administrative   cost center increases proposed for additional legal expenses, should they be necessary, beginning in October for special counsel as part of the evaluation of the dissolution of the District.
Once the budget is approved for purposes of sending it to the County whic h occurred in May,  the rate of assessment cannot be increased. Any additional spending as alluded to will be addressed under the revenue section with a number called Revenue Carry Forward. Key Marco has approximately $1,000,000 in cash, and at year's end t hat amount will be carried forward  and shown on the balance sheet as cash. For budget purposes, $347,000 of that amount will be recognized, and with offsets on the expense side showing these major capital improvements which the Board did not originally rec ognize in May. Under capital outlay there is about
$303,000 for capital improvements which were not there originally, and under proposed management and legal fees, $25,000 is shown for legal fees in the coming year, and the

management fees attributable to the Homeowners' Association in recognition of Mrs. Maline's work have increased to $80,000.
Those were the only real substantive changes, and Mr. Dorrill asked Mrs. McFarland if she had any further comments. Mrs. McFarland felt that Mr. Dorrill's summary was very good, and addressing Mr. Krutisch's comment, she indicated that the capital outlay section showed
$230,000 for the roads being budgeted, and the bridge repair, streetlight project and guard gate roof have all been put in the budget for the coming year. Additionally, the land lease for
$31,000 which is transferred over to the HOA was shown, and the amount of money paid for   Mrs. Maline going to the HOA, as the District pays $72,000 of the $90,000 of that line item. Mr. Krutisch asked if the road repairs were coming out of the reserves, and Mrs. McFarland   indicated that they were definitely coming out of the savings they have in cash, which is why    the  allocation fo  cash is so large. It  is meant to be  used for large infrastructure projects such as the bridge and the road. If the Board decides to do that work, the money is in that fund and allocated in the budget.
Mr. Kerins talked about the maintenance yard that needed to be cleaned up, and he was told   that the CDD was going to return it in the condition they received it, and right now if the HOA wanted to do anything with the property they would have to pay to have quite a bit of work  done, including fill and sod, regardless of what is done with it. Suggestions have been made for its use, including a garden, but it must be cleaned up first.
Mrs. McFarland indicated that when they leased the maintenance yard they did agree that when they stopped the lease they would return it in the condition it was found, and it certainly is not there. She agreed that the yard needs to be returned to the way  it was when leased to the   CDD, and she would support getting that done. Mr. Krutisch noted that one of the reasons it wasn't done was that they did not know what was going to be done with it. There was some discussion about it and many ideas were suggested , but for now he was not sure whether the concrete should be removed as they may decide they need it for something in the future. Mrs. McFarland asked if this item could be put on the agenda for the September meeting, and Mrs. Maline was asked to work with the HOA and a CDD Board member to see if there was any thoughts about what would make sense for this yard, and a determination must be made as to what the CDD should do to put it back as it was if that is what the HOA wishes.
Mr. Kerins felt that it would  be difficult to determine what can be done with it in the state it  now is, and perhaps the concrete should be removed. Mrs. McFarland suggested that the concrete could be rehabbed, but it was felt that the concrete was in very bad shape. It was agreed that Mrs. Maline will work with both Boards over the next month and at the September

meeting it will be discussed, as the District does not want to carry a continued liability for this area. Mr. Krutisch indicated that if the costs would be $1,000 to $2,000 then it would make sense to do it now. Mrs. Grado asked if the HOA would accept it the way it is now, and was advised by Mr. Kerins that that he would vote against it, and that it would be relatively inexpensive to scrape off the concrete that is there.
A MOTION was then made by Mrs. McFarland and seconded by Mrs. Grado to close the public hearing for the 2018 Budget on a unanimous vote of the Board.

A second MOTION was then made by Mrs. Grado and seconded by Mrs. McFarland to adopt Resolution 2017-07 to adopt the Budget for fiscal year 2018 for maintenance and operations. The total budget for the District is $956,145, and passed unanimously.

A third Motion was then made by Mrs. McFarland and seconded by Mrs. Grado to adopt Resolution 2017-08 to adopt the assessment and assessment role for purposes of transmitting it to the property appraiser and tax collector for inclusion on the tax bill that will go out in November and passed unanimously. The total rate of assessment for non ad valorem assessments is $629,800, and the rate is $4,700 per lot as established by the Resolution.

FINAL AUDIENCE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Mr. Krutisch asked if the allocated funds for costs and allocated income tax deduct able costs were noted so the information can be given to the residents for their CPA to make note of the difference in their personal taxes and what is deductible. Mr. Dorrill indicated that this had not been done, but certain tax professionals will indica te that based on Treasury or IRS rules that while the non ad valorem assessment appears on the property tax bill, the entire bill is deductible for personal tax returns.
Mr. Kerins spoke to the concept of designated reserves that must be set up that way in the  budget, and some of these are deductible and some are not. Mrs. McFarland indicated at this  point that no one was giving any tax advice, but merely speaking about what they have heard in an informal, open forum.

NEXT MEETING SCHEDULE/ADJOURNMENT
It was agreed that the next meeting would be held on September 21st, and the meeting was adjourned on a MOTION by Mrs. McFarland and a second by Mrs. Grado at 10:25 a.m.

Katie Maline

From:	Koncar, Robert <Bob.Koncar@STServices.com>
Sent:	Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:08 AM
To:	Katie Maline
Subject:	Cost Proposal
Attachments:	Scope of Services.docx

Follow Up Flag:	Follow Up
Due By:	Wednesday, August 2, 2017 7:36 AM
Flag Status:	Flagged

Katie, we have reviewed the scope of services you submitted to us. We have the following response to the proposed scope of service:

Our price for the proposed scope is $14,150 annually;
The price is based upon the following questions being answered:
> What is the expectation of Severn Trent Staff attending meetings and/or visiting the office?
>We anticipate the requirement to produce monthly financial statements, is this correct?
> Our pricing is good for sixty days and is contingent upon us executing a mutually agreeable contract.
I also wanted to mention that in addition to having provided service to the District in the past, the Staff member that used to be the accountant for the District is on our staff as our Accounting Manager.
We look forward to hearing from you about our proposal.

Bob Koncar
77eneral Manager - Management Services
S eve r n T r en t N o r t h A m er i c a
5911 Country Lakes Drive, Fort Myers, Florida 33905 239 245 7118	904/626-0593
www.severntrentservices.corn

1

Key Marco	
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO:

505 Whiskey Creek Drive	

September 6, 2017	
DA TE

Allison Murrell	239-777-5131	

STREET

 Marco Island, FL 34145	

SALES  REPRESENTATIVE

Key Marco Community

PHONE NO.

239-394-4346	

CITY, STATE, AND ZIP

 Katie Maline	
ATTN.:

JOB NAME	PHONE NO.

Key Marco Community
JOB LOCATION	FAX NO.

Clean out storm drains using Vacuum Excavation. Client will provide a place to discard debris.
*After completion of the job, EV can remove the debris from the jobsite for an additional fee if needed.

Vacuum Storm Drains	$250 per hour

Estimate 40hrs - $10,000

Disclaimer
Locating underground utilities is not an exact science. Therefore, Earthview, LLC ("EV") expresses no guarantees that using one of any of the available technologies for identifying utilities/structures will identify &utilities/structures and/or meet the objective of each individual project. By authorizing, it is understood that limitations within the available technology, the complexity of site conditions and circumstances beyond the control of EV may limit the performance/results of the EV services. The services provided by EV shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices as related to nature of services performed. EV cannot guarantee that all utilities within any given survey area will be identified as a result of inherent limitations with the technology and existing site conditions. The Project Owner and any of its subcontractors shall hold harmless and indemnify EV against any and all losses as a result of inability to locate or mislocate due to limitations within the available technology, the complexity of site conditions and circumstances beyond its control. Hand digging is required in all situations when excavating within 24" of Earth View LLC markings.

CUSTOMER — SIGNATURE & DATE	Earthview, LLC. — SIGNATURE & DATE

Key Marco Community Dev District Financial Statements
Ten Months Ended July 31, 2017

Key Marco Community Dev District BALANCE SHEET
July 32, 2017
General Fund

Current Assets
Cash in bank

$954,100.50

Total Current Assets
Mita' Assets		 S	954,100.50	
Land	1,969,2.03.29		
Butldblgs	143369,43		
earn Depr- Buildings	(106307.37)		
Improvements	882,984.49		
Accum Depr • improvernents	(660,871.25)		
Infrastructure
Accum Depr - infrastructure Machinery .& Equipment	6,511,876.05
123,058.68		
Accurn Depr- Mach & Eqip	(26.,652.96)		
Total Fixed Assets		 	4.837.995,47 	
Total Assets		    $	5802,096.97 	

{31998,354.89}

Liabilities
Accunts Payable	 	38,312.31	

Total Liabilities	38,512.31
Fund Balance
Residual Equity Transfers In	26,950.0
Fund Balance - Unreserved		5,661,899.14 Excess Revenues (Expenditures)	 		70,995 43	
Total Fund Balance	 		5.769„784.66 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance		$		5808,096.97

Sea Accountant's Compilation ;Report

Key Marco Commui;ity Dev District
STATEM ENl Of REVENUE" AND EXPE'.N SE·
General Fund

flDlo'{I IJ '>!'!

Di'lQ M9tl4.!• f nded J tM U , 1.-01 7

l:\!fT'f?nt Pert,:,.	turml!t rm:tm!'	'Ye n Mooth [lilde!l	'rcair ti} !;11111!-	'faar tfl O !.l!i	oflr .m 1,1!
ll!Jlleirt	te	l!Jl!i' '.U,101'f	il1Jd1iet	V   flMt.il-	idi!i!t

NIJO Ad VHk m /i.l.rou.me111s. , $
ll'lli!tlSt lnr.Dll!
0.l!'lll!'1@ t,my r·m'Niird ml:e:Ml!!ite ll anr.ou1Oe, V!!flUH

o.o::t .$
952.9{1
Q.00
0.00

Cl,00   $	D.00	s	5.DG,2-00.00	s	AA K'.tl.oo	$	(1&,140 _._,m  $	Gm,   i:fXl.00
17.!.l,1 7	7T3,H	G,5fi'ii,;,J!!	l ,TSl ,70	4,ijl)J.,3[1,	2,:1-50,co
1_.Slt:i. 3	fi.,m ,  )	!ll.00	15,..fiQrB {:	f15,D  .'.!.(J	1, 9i:I00.00
l tli,67	(16,67	281}.111	G5,,n,	1u.n	200..1:r,)'

sw:.rn

)	1j779.11	.fs.26 .2'1!   	

s-.10-    	E:il:(l.7'lil,7D	

, · ,t;,5,5,6Q)

li     :1-,'Al,OO

Taitnf ll	LilE'l!	 	9/i.2.S I

ndl illla
/t.  oM .iidm.Lv! 'itmr.lve lloo:rd :if	!:!f'll!!ilr f'er:s
11'-ill'l'Oil i!l( Elipen
M9 r'l1!,!Jemm  l·t
l'fuilSl:rlpt lf?i;') il'..J!is:
;\Udit i'r.
r IFt1Jn,g l'
!Klill lt.lW,m t ,t;nt il I pr p PiQperty Ap11r,,il or Feas
fa toll(.:t1Jr F!IBS
1.c-g.;1 IFt'!t:;;
ni]]rie.&lir'l.!i fl!.'eS Plh711 & C:cmr lt:1r Cr:tmpU1l?'l' Sllrvke
r.nt l.i 8i: LCl'.I
iMurance - G-!!ncr.il lr(i;:11 M nrtlil ne: ofnt:e s11pp1t _;
S1,1bm 1pr,:m & □UC!.

0 .00			a31 ,! g			3B9.		 -11.,{100.00		 3.::133,3D			(ijl:i&.7(1►			-4,oo:1.oo CJ.oci	41 , G7	4:J!,f,1		0,00	16 ..70	4i6  ,:10	500.0J 1,25<1,00		4,!iCO.Qf.!		,2 0.00	.28,?i!iM -		5,0:J0,00		li,2l ti,fi5,		5'1-,JJl..11100
O.Oll	,::1,00	0.00	l ,.4:2:-l-.oo	j,.C!00.00	rililO,llOI	1,000.00
0.00	,til[i,67	-i:,• .'57	.oi,a?.$100	4,:rnr,.7'!	l'l'OS.aO)	5,000.CXJ
.Il'l;'.tt a	1,25.0,00	6,50_00	n,25tl.oo	i Z. 00.00	3,::!titl.00	l.!., OOJ.
(1.00	D..i;i-D	1100	l.,00000	1,00{l,00	(1.00	1,l);J(;,.00
(1.00	[), I):)	-0.00	9,Gi'i$.OIJ	::lD,(llll)..O!I•	3 52,(()	IJ.,(!00.00
0.00	D.00	{!,[II]	H;,  . o	:l:!l.,000.Q:.1	1, '27,4.&J	JS,000.00
1,9rSi!i, 2	,:J·,00	(l ,!i'66,Z-5I	zs.m. 2	10.ftlC,r;tJ	(w,m .ri J	10,000.M
..·.oo	a.oo	135.1,00	1:tl,170.100	2,000.00	(1D.4'ro.oo)	2.lJ«r.O'i.l
3 ..00	3.a3	0.39	:ll!-611!1	333,510	(52,791	i!00,00
a.oo	1).(10	c,.r.()	1 ,002.51	lil'(IOO	(•19:LS1)	600.00
.00	:125.00	!OC\C-0	m    , !:;:i	1,2l1-Cl,C-O	2G.4!;l	1,50'.l.00
50.(IQ	4SD.OH	300;00	u,m.oo	9Moo.oo	1.)11;},00	31,0CO.oo
[},00	,:J,00	Cl.o;J	iJ,   1.54	7;,,000.00	(V l2L '5'1)	.'!,i!00 .00
J.S.. 00	0,00	: s.wJ	11:WAO	/100,00	(80,IIO)	400.00
1'.1,00	0 .00	0.00	17S..OO·	200.00	25.QO	200.00

fiilnk G,"ie-'1¢s

tl-' • 'rn	0.00	(Ji9'J l\1	!i33.. a

, pno	,  l!!.1!!)	Of.Hl

Ali:G.Ol

.    1.191,  i'1;, '

2,72 .fiG

:137 ,1 6.10

. (i 1,i;;:i 1 .w 1

Mhe>elhmell"JS jll]n

!1.0!l	4i.67	L 6.f	(l , 00	.C:,1.6 7	H 6,10	500.0!)

 	

ftrW l:rpt!ndllr.11'{!!

5?Q2:-i,

1§2,l OO.OO

2

Key Marco Commonitv Dev Distrkt
STATEMENT OF RF.VENUE AND' EXPENSE
General Fund

t peniilllilf!l\
.F/4-M M-MlJ\i'ffllMtS,j/r,;inn

Ot! M ITi,i   if'Sl	Cl,ir1t1-11t:Perlmli	<"A!f iil  P.erlad	T 1 Ptk' mths Elldfd	'i/,i:mrt.11  Ht	Y:QJ'lf b!i riaoo	/!r,11rn,1
Ililt( :1-:1!,U fl'.ii'	Dl.:!Clest	1J°NRUll:X':	l!Mf 31, .ZIH7	l!IIJi11tU	Vll'An	iiudp

fldd ,\,1ijJ'l     1  fi i Servlrr;,;	12,(J{.:O.OJ	ll',l!O	In, DOO.OW.·	41/.IOO..O{I	1 .00	,t4l)}r..i:WO)	0.00
r,1mt;i!:, Le:!$1l!t	0,00	i1M"i'	4H,'.I	·0,00	'1, 6.7{),	41 1 '/ t)	00.00

_oo

t ""1tr { luel Se n1k.a	0 .00	1011.3:l	1.0 .	();1)0	7.,llll .W	2,0 Q:l.:1(1	.$00.00

!olllf Etp1mttlbtir	r _  ...  12t

-	25Q.(!J     -    _    f   : 50.-00)	_4		 	l \o;WJ		F·B,5W OO)	3,00:U!O ]

ENjtti'tdlturc.s
IMtmDpJllfl
lnmmn, ij - Wmken  (J.).lll j;	C•.00	D,00	iltrJ	100.00	0.00	,     001	D.00
mgi:;i,ic Si!,\,lcc.i	-DIOO	0 .1'.tl	l}. 00	87'5,64	0.00	(S76-ti'4)	It.IX!
cont r,H,tUill S!!r.'	'.1!2,192.00	u ,.m::,1;-,	U,l l!.i,33J	1H  i,320,79	:111,flli(i. 0	(4,654,09]	1  4,000,00
l'I>M! Tfi tn11.11ng	Omo     :Z,,;lBU	1,IJB5.S3	,1,,SC0..00	2(1,oa . d	11'f,m  .  o	25,.oo:,1,00
Clrnmlt ;:i( .	IJ.00	11.00	0.00	U 7 2,l')'.J	'1,00	l ,m·.ooJ	D..Q.O
How r flllQ)'ullfl	380.00	416.b1'	:!G.G'1'	vi.1.r..00	4,161170	l ,at.'il,SO	5,000.00
,r,iiJl h Pffltirum		0,00		l,2 Dj)j		1,:ma-00         1.200.00	l.2,500.00•         :t.2.'10.00	15,o;l1100 f1 la11t fh!riki:1:n-mri1 Pfl'.1'f'l!rn         l,o!l6,	1,lll'l$.$7			iC,CM57	:!.1;1,131i.50	11i;liii6..70		ti,5911..M	] 0 ,!.:Q';],00 L1111d  1Lr.  1a•	[-.,10 6.00	 ;i,563.B	(a,522.IIl)	 20, os .oo	 :1:s..e a. o	(2,2MJ,7DJ	 3l)000,00
MISJ:D!lilnMill ll pcnsn	·D,00

r	I E1'Jti!ni:IICi.tt-es	I	!il,i.'14.00	S.3.'!I!

:t1',15lMlO	li.:1.:1:J.

[$,tOOJ	0.00

16'6,W,	5. IJ

i945D!.l-OO	833,30

'..! IM,17	:1.,000,C(!

:Bil llO.'.l cy'.J	
P.i' p;and'i UQ:O									
ri'.nMi'r"QlN,lli,lt MS									

fMpl!!ndilum									
u'ii'hrJ:nu									
El'n trk: Si!nit cs		l,9 !Hi9.	1,125,0;i	(094!.li9)	':12,,(]9 4..0	1i, ()j)Q	11A"14,IJ5I·	l.3,500.00	
ri.eualn & }h::'f,t • ri;nn  f"JI		't. 110I,XI	41G,S7	(1 ,W ,33)	4,S915.00	4,• .71)	( 2!1.:39')	5,000.01}	
H, i:i tfay Li,t,111		0.0(1	i'J.00	.00	l,.1.   5-.00	t500.00	1,155-.00	.001).0:J	
't.otal  l!llilll Uri!S	I	_	4,-00-9.	 	1; 1(3l, 5i' 	T12,73,0EI	J.1!,·IB 5'-0.S	11,91'5,70	11J 1 il!l,5f	2j ,	.{I{}	

J

STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EKP.ENSE
C.iene.ral Fund

ooo Monet Eil4ed	Orrnm f>'l rlixi	(UffCn,t PerlDd	n l"i fl'ii'iliilln ,Cndl!'dl	\'-'IIRf	[lf!!J!I	Yuur -bn Daro	Anr1ual	
l!!!IOl,.0011	llud&!!t	\!'arla na-:	Jufy a1,2a,1-.r	fll•t	V	yJ ,	udiprt	

qi fi1111lt uru.
A-4:ft',!fl.l! C
UttlltySilrYk s	5:10.91	.!m.a:3,	J02,4'.	.  f:3.16	:-i'.,: J . (;l	,365.l.4	llJ,.ooJ,00
i; m.ser-... i!	(i,31	(!,00	(r.. 1)	::rn..a2	0..00	f!ELB )	D.on,
J!el},ll r.s & Mlllnc - Ji r1:;			(l.M		- 1 6.G,		,1.J{i,67'		U.!l .l7		,16-5.10		1!1J:,4il		s.clO'li!Q f-:ep irJ Milllnt • G:?ltP.fwu5e		ffl i,00			1<14>:J,OO)		·1,0<!IS,lJ ·	_   ,(J(:Qc	rs..01rn.?;il		2J)00.00 L":.;m r  tmil Seflkl  'i!	6,,575. IJ	:.',IX>::t,00		1 24.G:)	69,8 (,13, 25	10,00{ .00		 196.1.S	lM,000,00
Tut.al GJip  ndf•1,,11' $	I	1 ,ffl    .62	8, 250 .00	 	3n,a;g	e.5.,HJg_n		8  ,500,00	(5  S..73)	.lDJ.,flOO.l;ti

tllfli!nlitues

1, 116 .5..00

li....'fl,li & M l!'il - rarts	0.00	li;:1:::;,;1	0§,'.U9	1,655 ,00	ii'   3-3()'	6i 68. 0	lQ,l;IOCl,,00

n,WID-pen.;llt	f

--- - -- - -

D 4)_'..I  -	-

.1!;'1

3,3,J

"R/fri,:13

8..33 -1(1	4 .Jll'	lD,o::J0.00

nif.Jturcs iI1/jjlatlDIJ
F.IQ!o'irlc5t!r  ll.1!'.S	2tifi.rn	ofJ.6 ,67	]5fl,!i:/	3,,AJ65,G.S	,q,li:J, lj 7,0	01.02	.!J00,00
Uliliillu  - W tcr	!:   .1-D	1,15(1,00	25-:!..;I{}	1fi,B:il ..!i7	l.'Z,5{!0.00	1 ,i.Ua.=s)'	15,00ClOO
ae µai'r.s & Ma ln, t  Gm1..rnl	UOU	1,250,00	,:2s.·u 10)	l!,1582,ilj	Z,S00.00	.3,ll-!7 .1 9'	!.5;C(J0.00
Ccntr m:tl;'ll-1S crvh:iei	P4.00	ofr.00	;:1aiUlO	!l,411.l'lO	-s,rno.oo	! ,l U ,ll,l;IJ	6 ,100..00
l (ll:81 ITNPm  ii I  .irl3	I	1,11_118,00	      .'91S:.G7	     20.157	    as.:m.S6		3  12M:7-D	( .OOl:i.9-€,J	4 1 ,100.00

_5 !if'll. 2

40,•163,5--   -	(1lJ,Q'rG.9		50[ t p. 7

1'Dt11 (lpc r.ilh "I! Ellfli!IU!ll!.4i',&l    I_	 	.;·1   n . o		r2 401i.2.r1	.i: &.m .oo

4

STATEMENT OF REVEN UE AND EXPENSE
General fund

Orie Mc:i0<1h< J!'>ded	Oar,ent Pcrl-O!J	Cu1Tc nt fi'oriniii	'!'cm Moritfui; tnd	Ylle r ro ti.roo	neri;;D.w::	llltWlil I	
July .n, ;u 11	B£ll!giit	Y;irl "1	Jol)-U , :.11):1-7	Elu	t	Vlirfanot	!JudIP''	

O!i;i1ol Ct.it"-3'{	.oo	l'.l.(lfl	(i.00	3,1100 . 00	0.00	ll. A00.001·	0.00
LEDl..lJ;\ltifn,i;	,	_ il, 00	llOO	0.00	10.1(,.10, 0	10..000.0::1	( 2@ .00 i	l D,o:ID.00	
l' oln l EYpon d,lbtll ll:5'	Cl.Qi)	Q,_@	     	0.C(_i----	1-11_, r;eJ ,OO	i D,O;Jo:.},l;Q_ _	_	_	4.il'.7J,{lQ)	10,00'}.l'}fl	

E:ilNi'HlltJ;ires
t(lli!i.t'i' F	& Q\  pf  '!l::11
Rnyr.nYc Re e:	
D.O'J	
! ,OD;J.'.ll	
.2,IJ;,'!:.3,.3.9	
D,00	
:e:!,fl.l3,3D	:tr,,w. o	
:l!l,OC(l,{;o	
Ct1ritl lteserl,l{l	U,00	2,4J:}. 2,	.:t4?0.	0.00	M;i'Oil,3D	:.!-4,10831}	29, 650 .00	

,a ;:il lo1!1)-8 1J it l t lf1!s.

il!l-,!!, ll.	

4;¥ 111 .8:i_	4, 6SD..PO 1

Total.Ml E p!J1'1rll• t!r.e1

5fifi&l.32

'1¥)3 1,5 0    	

O. _i}O

..·,•_!-;-M.  ,l (i. _

4 .s.5U S	 	0.00	

,[s !:i1 2,s f	52?,199.i!i?	5Ji, 2'1:fi.00 

12l-0 75,93.

6 . 5(1.00

lcte«J:>i Rit ttrilies jE!qln ndiw re.s) f S	_ ( 4 9,607A2f 5:

J·l,-·. 'i.-9·.Y--

f-l.-t7.R- ·li5 ,7,.S,.JL  S,   	7(1,'!,135-..43     t	(W  ,!Hli  , i O]    .$

rn.ss1. 1  s	a.i:'(I

·

L•