Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting November 16, 2022
To immediately follow the landowners meeting 505 Whiskey Creek Drive, Marco Island, FL 34145

Anyone wishing to listen and participate in the meeting can do so by calling 1-888-468-1195, Participant Pin 636522.

Additionally, participants are encouraged to submit questions and comments to the District Manager in advance to facilitate the Board's consideration of such questions and comments during the meeting.

The agenda is as follows:

Call to Order/Roll Call
Approval of Agenda
Public Comments
Approval of Minutes
October 19, 2022 Regular Meeting
Old Business
Update on Annual Financial Report Submission
New Business
2023-04 Canvassing Resolution
2023-05 Resolution Appointing Officers
Attorney Report
Engineer Report
Bridge Inspection Report
Bridge/Gatehouse Painting Quote Update
Quotes for Drainage System Inspection
Evaluation of Hurricane Damage to Roads
Supervisors’ Requests
District Manager Report
Update on Hurricane Recovery
Expedited Debris Cleanup
Bridge Streetlights and Navigation Lights
Gatehouse Electric Repairs

Irrigation System Repairs
FEMA Mitigation Funding for Bridge & Gatehouse
City of Marco Island Bike Access Meeting Postponed to February
Public Comments
Adjournment

1
2
3
4
Appearances

Key Marco Community Development District Regular Meeting
October 19, 2022

Mary Beth Schewitz, Chairman
Luanne Kerins, Co-Chair
Terri Stanton
Lynnn Domenici
John Esposito (Via Speakerphone)
Also Present
Joshua Carter, District Manager
Dave Schmitt, Hole Montes
14
15	CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
16
17	The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 8:40 a.m., and it was noted that all
18	members were in attendance.
19
20	APPROVAL OF AGENDA
21
22	The Estimate to provide an inspection to the Key Marco Bridge was added to the Engineer’s
23	Report, and no public comment was received at this time.
24
25	APPROVAL OF MINUTES
26
27	On a voice vote by Mrs. Schewitz and a second by Mrs. Domenici, the June Budget Minutes
28	were unanimously approved.
29
30	On a voice vote by Mrs. Schewitz and a second by Mrs. Kerins, the June Regular Meeting
31	Minutes were unanimously approved.
32
33	OLD BUSINESS
34
35	No old business was addressed at this time.
36
37	NEW BUSINESS
38
Budget Resolution for CDD Insurance
Mr. Carter noted that the proposed premium for the CDD Insurance renewal was $30,922,
exceeding the budget originally set at $30,000. A budget amendment resolution was introduced
to increase the Insurance line-item amount by $922.
On a voice vote by Mrs. Schewitz and a second by Mrs. Domenici, the budget amendment
resolution was passed unanimously.

Resolution to Set Meeting Calendar FY 2022-2023
Mr. Carter noted that the annual meeting schedule for the upcoming year had not been set and
introduced a resolution to set the upcoming schedule. The draft schedule included meeting
dates on the third Wednesday of each month at 8:30 AM at 505 Whiskey Creek Drive. The
board of supervisors proposed eliminating the August 2023 meeting and move the Preliminary
budget meeting to April.
On a voice vote by Mrs. Schewitz, seconded by Mrs. Domenici, the amended resolution to
approve the meeting schedule was approved unanimously.
53
Landowners Meeting Resolution
Mr. Carter noted that the upcoming November 16 Landowners Meeting was approaching and
as noted in the June 23 Regular Meeting, Mrs. Stanton, Mrs. Schewitz and Mrs. Domenici terms
would be up for election. All three supervisors indicated that they would be running for re-
election and a resolution was introduced to confirm the proposed rules, ballots and procedure
discussed in the June 23 Regular Meeting.
On a voice vote by Mrs. Schewitz, seconded by Mrs. Kerins, the resolution was passed
unanimously.
ATTORNEY’S REPORT
63
Mr. Urbancic did not attend the October 19 Regular Meeting of Key Marco Community
Development District and a report was not supplied.
66
67	ENGINEER’S REPORT
68
Hurricane Damage Report
Mr. Schmitt noted that in the week following Hurricane Ian, Holes Montes provided an
inspection of the Districts’ roadways and bridge roadway for flooding and damages following
the storm. Bob Ferguson of Holes Montes provided an inspection of the top side of Key Marco
Bridge, noting the absence of any new damage from the storm. It was noted that while there
may have been flooding in the low spots in the roadways, new damages were not apparent.
Bridge Inspection Estimate
Mr. Schmitt noted that while the roadway of the bridge did not show any damages, the bridge
pilings may require inspection for any damage caused by increased water levels and flooding.
Mr. Schmitt noted that such an inspection would require a dive team to inspect cracking,
scouring and general damage to the waterway pilings supporting the bridge. Mr. Schmitt
presented an estimate to the amount of $12,085 for the basic inspection and $6,000 for the
diving inspection to a total amount of $18,085. A member of the public suggested that the
district may find value in investigating the cost of an acoustic survey noting that this would
provide sonar imaging of any damage and could cost less than a diving survey. Mr. Schmitt
noted that he would request a quote for an acoustic survey, though noted that the cost of an
acoustic may cost more than the diving survey. Mrs. Schewitz suggested that the district should
only pursue the acoustic survey if the cost were not to exceed the $6,000 estimate for the
diving inspection.

On a voice vote by Mrs. Schewitz, second by Mrs. Stanton, a motion to approve the bridge
inspection and diving or acoustic survey not to exceed $6,000 was approved unanimously.
90
91	Mr. Schmitt noted that he would have an updated estimate for bridge painting and pavement
92	services in a future meeting.
93
94	SUPERVISORS’ REQUESTS
95
96	No requests from the supervisors were received at this time.
97
98	DISTRICT MANAGER’S REPORT
99
A.	Acceptance of Annual Financial Report
Mr. Carter noted that the Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 prepared by the
district’s audit firm had not yet been approved by the Board of Supervisors. The Supervisors
reviewed the report. On a voice vote by Mrs. Schewitz, seconded by Mrs. Stanton, the Annual
Financial Report was accepted unanimously.
105
B. Hurricane Ian Cleanup Report
Mr. Carter provided an update on the ongoing cleanup, recovery and repairs following
Hurricane Ian. Mr. Carter noted that the district’s landscape provider cleared the roadway of
debris the day following the storm and would begin their pickup of debris piles throughout the
CDD property. Mr. Carter noted that due to the saltwater, many of the district’s plants and
trees had been killed and may require replacement. Mr. Carter noted that he would work
alongside the district’s landscape provider to determine the billing process for plant
replacement if required. The Key Marco Gatehouse suffered damage to its gate operators for
the resident gate as well as the exterior exit gate due to the storm. Both gates remained open
following the storm when power was restored, and the district’s access control provider would
be out in the coming weeks to repair the gates.
117
Mrs. Schewitz noted that following the storm, the navigation lights and streetlights on Key
Marco bridge were not operating and would require attention. Mr. Carter noted that he would
contact the district’s electric provider for a service to return functionality to the bridge
navigation and streetlights.
122
123
124
PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment was received at this time.
127
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting will be held in November on the 16th immediately following the landowners
meeting
131

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was then adjourned at 9:45 a.m. on a Motion by Mrs. Schewitz and a second by
Mrs. Kerins. The motion was passed unanimously.

RESOLUTION 2023-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CANVASSING AND CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF THE LANDOWNERS ELECTION OF SUPERVISORS FOR KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT HELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.006, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE

WHEREAS, based upon records made available to Key Marco Community Development District (the “District”), the District currently has less than 250 qualified electors in the District; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 190.006(3), Florida Statutes, the District must hold a landowners’ election to fill the seats of those Supervisors whose terms are expiring; and

WHEREAS, the District called a landowners’ meeting for the purpose of holding such a landowners’ election; and

WHEREAS, following proper publication of notice thereof, such landowners’ meeting was held November 16, 2022, at which the below recited persons were duly elected by virtue of the votes cast in his/her favor; and

WHEREAS, this Resolution canvasses the votes, and declares and certifies the results of said election.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

Section 1.   Vote Tabulation/Election Results. The following persons are found, certified, and declared to have been duly elected as Supervisors of and for the District, having been elected by the votes cast in his/her favor as shown:

	Votes

	Votes

	Votes

Section 2.   Terms. In accordance with said Section 190.006, Florida Statutes, and by virtue of the number of votes cast for the respective Supervisors, they are declared to have been elected for the following term of office:

four (4) year term

four (4) year term

two (2) year term

Section 3.  Commencement of Terms. The terms of office set forth in Section 2 shall commence immediately upon the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 4.  Severability. If any section or part of a section of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional, the validity, force and effect of any other section or part of a section of this Resolution shall not thereby be affected or impaired unless it clearly appears that such other section or part of a section of this Resolution is wholly or necessarily dependent upon the section or part of a section so held to be invalid or unconstitutional, it being expressly found and declared that the remainder of this Resolution would have been adopted despite the invalidity of such section or part of such section.

Section 5.  Conflicts. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, superseded and repealed.

Section 6.  Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Key Marco Community Development District this 16th day of November, 2022.

Attest:	KEY MARCO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chair/Vice-Chair

RESOLUTION 2023-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT RE-DESIGNATING THE OFFICERS OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (“Board”) of Key Marco Community Development District (“District”) previously designated the officers of the District; and

WHEREAS, the Board now desires to re-designate and/or appoint certain persons to the offices specified in this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Section 1.  Designation of Officers. The following persons are appointed to the offices shown:

Chair	 		
Vice Chair	 		
Treasurer	 		
Secretary	 		
Assistant Secretary	 		
Assistant Secretary	 		
Assistant Secretary	 		

Section 2.  Rescission of Prior Designations. All prior officer designations of the Board that are inconsistent with the designations set forth above are hereby rescinded.

Section 3.  Severability. If any section or part of a section of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional, the validity, force and effect of any other section or part of a section of this Resolution shall not thereby be affected or impaired unless it clearly appears that such other section or part of a section of this Resolution is wholly or necessarily dependent upon the section or part of a section so held to be invalid or unconstitutional, it being expressly found and declared that the remainder of this Resolution would have been adopted despite the invalidity of such section or part of such section.

Section 4.	Conflicts. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, superseded and repealed.

Section 5.	Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Key Marco Community Development District this 16th day of November, 2022.

KEY MARCO COMMUNITY
Attest:	DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Joshua Carter, Secretary	Chair/Vice-Chair

November 10, 2022

Prepared for:

Prepared by:

BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT STUDY REPORT

WHISKEY CREEK DRIVE BRIDGE

KEY MARCO, FLORIDA
RALPH VERRASTRO, PE
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 15863 SECOYA RESERVE CIRCLE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110

THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY RALPH VERRASTRO ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL. PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS.

WHISKEY CREEK DRIVE BRIDGE
Bridge Inspection and Management Study Report

Contents
Report

Appendix
Site Map – Tab 1 Bridge Inspection Field Report with Diving Inspection Report – Tab 2
Bridge Inspection Photographs – Tab 3

November 10, 2022

David W. Schmitt, Senior Project Manager Hole Montes, Inc.
950 Encore Way
Naples, Florida 34110 c/o
Key Marco Community Development District 505 Whiskey Creek Drive
Marco Island, FL 34145

RE:	Whiskey Creek Drive Bridge over Rookery Bay Bridge Inspection and Management Study Report

Dear Mr. Schmitt:

KCI Technologies, Inc. (KCI) performed a visual inspection of the vehicular bridge that is owned and maintained by the Key Marco Community Development District (CDD) in Collier County, Florida on October 31, 2022. This bridge inspection and evaluation report summarizes the findings of the inspection and provides recommendations for maintenance repairs. The bridge is considered safe to carry legal traffic loadings, but short term and long maintenance repairs are recommended to prevent further deterioration and prolong the service life of the bridge.

The CDD has requested this in-depth inspection of the bridge, as part of their fiduciary responsibility to maintain the infrastructure in the community and provide for adequate financial reserves for future maintenance repairs. KCI performed a visual inspection of all accessible bridge elements and obtained measurements for comparison to the conditions reported from previous inspections. We documented the condition of each bridge element on a copy of the inspection report form prepared in 2012 using a number rating system required by Federal Bridge Inspection procedures. We determined the soundness of the exposed concrete surfaces of the bridge using sounding techniques. We also obtained measurements of the channel bottom profile for evidence of erosion and scour. We hired a Volkert, Inc. to provide a diving inspection of the underwater bridge elements. A copy of their report is attached to our field report included under Tab 2.

BRIDGE DESCRIPTION

We prepared a site map to show the location of the bridge and it is included in the Appendix of this report in Tab 1. The bridge carries Whiskey Creek Drive over Blue Hill Creek. The bridge was constructed circa 1994. The reputed owner of the bridge is the

Key Marco Community Development District (CDD).

The bridge spans Blue Hill Creek which is designated as a navigable waterway by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The two-lane bridge has 13 spans at a 38’-6” spacing with an approximate total length of 500’-6”.

The superstructure consists of nine (9) adjacent, prestressed concrete slab beams that are 3’-8” wide. The slab beams are post tensioned transversely. The wearing surface consists of 2” of asphalt concrete with a sidewalk on the west side of the bridge and a narrow safety walk on the east side.

The sidewalks consist of precast concrete panels that form a utility chase. Utilities owned by the City of Marco Island are carried in these utility chases.

The deck expansion joints consist of elastomeric concrete headers with poured silicone seals.

The traffic railings are a custom designed system made up of concrete pilasters and steel rails.

The substructures consist of cast-in-place concrete bents supported on pre-stressed concrete piles.

The bridge inspection report completed on site during the inspection is included in the Appendix of this report in Tab 2. The bridge inspection photographs are included in the Appendix of this report in Tab 3.

A scour evaluation was performed and compared to the past inspection reports.

Bridge maintenance repairs were performed under the supervision of BSLLC in the spring of 2015 to address some of the deficiencies documented in the 2012 inspection report.

DEFICIENCIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Abutments and Wingwalls – There are isolated areas that have minor spalling of the concrete surfaces. This deficiency does not warrant immediate attention but should be monitored and repairs will likely be required in the future when the condition advances.

Piers – There are isolated areas that have minor spalling of the concrete surfaces. This deficiency does not warrant immediate attention but should but should be monitored and repairs will likely be required in the future when the condition advances.

Expansion Joints – The expansion joints were replaced during the 2015 repairs and are in relatively good condition. We noticed some minor cracking and delamination of the elastomeric concrete headers and minor deterioration of the poured sealant material.

These deficiencies do not warrant immediate attention but should but should be monitored and repairs will likely be required in the future when the condition advances.

Water Channel – We documented the channel profile using drop line measurements along both sides of the bridge at the same locations that were used in the past inspections. The results of our measurements compared to the prior inspection provides documentation that the river bottom elevations have remained consistent. There does not appear to be any concern about erosion or scour at the bridge channel piers. This was confirmed by Volkert, Inc. during the diving inspection.

Under Water Inspection - An underwater inspection was performed in 2012 that found very minor deficiencies and was updated as part of this inspection.

Roadway Approaches – The embankment slopes are in good condition.

Bridge Railings – The bridge railings are in good condition. The joint filler material in the gaps between the railing pylons is showing signs of deterioration. This deficiency does not warrant immediate attention but should but should be monitored and repairs will likely be required in the future when the condition advances.

Wearing Surface – The asphalt wearing surface was replaced in 2015 and is in good condition. We noticed some very minor longitudinal cracks that appear to align with the joints in the slab beams. This deficiency does not warrant immediate attention but should but should be monitored and repairs will likely be required in the future when the condition advances.

Prestressed Slab Beams - There are isolated areas that have minor spalling of the concrete surfaces. This deficiency does not warrant immediate attention but should be monitored and repairs will likely be required in the future when the condition advances. A waterproofing membrane was installed below the asphalt wearing surface in 2015 and is preventing water from leaking through the joints in the slab beams.

BRIDGE LOAD CAPACITY

Load rating calculations from the original construction are not available. We contacted the engineering firm that designed the bridge, and they did not have archive copies of the original construction plans. Based on the date of construction, the live load design truck is most likely the HS-20 vehicle which consists of a 36-ton semi-trailer truck configuration. Performing a load rating of this bridge currently is possible but much more expensive than if the original plans were available. A load rating is not required at this time but if deficient conditions become apparent during a future inspection a load rating would be required.

SHORT TERM REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS

No short-term repairs are required.

PREVENTATIVE (LONG TERM) MAINTENANCE REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS

The design life of concrete bridges is 75 years if the bridge is designed in accordance with the recommendations included in the AASHTO design specifications. Therefore, the estimated remaining design life and the estimated remaining service life of this bridge is approximately 43 years. The actual service life depends on whether preventative maintenance repairs are performed. The estimated remaining life for a bridge is based on engineering judgment and considers the original design life and anticipated time when the bridge conditions may require emergency repairs to remain open to traffic. Upon completion of the recommended repairs, the estimated remaining bridge life is usually extended. However, with proper maintenance this bridge may remain in service beyond its design life if the following preventative maintenance repair recommendations are performed.

Biennial Bridge Inspections - Perform follow up inspections of the bridge every 2 years in a format like this inspection. We recommend performing updated diving inspections every 5 years. The biennial bridge inspection process facilitates the early detection of structural defects. The cost of repairs is typically much less when the deficiency is detected early, compared to the cost after the condition advances.

Bridge Cleaning, Sealing and Painting - Regular cleaning of the bridge members is necessary to remove accumulation of sand, debris, bird droppings, and other harmful material by flushing with high-pressure water jet or compressed air, sweeping, or shovel. Preventative maintenance, or periodic cleaning can prolong the service life of the bridge members. There are also numerous concrete sealers that protect the concrete from water intrusion which may be considered after a cleaning is performed. This bridge has painted metal railings which will need to be painted when the coating fails. We recommend cleaning, sealing, and painting the bridge every 10 to 15 years.

Asphalt Wearing Surface - Replacement of the asphalt wearing surface includes removal of the existing asphalt by milling. Depending on the condition at the time, the underlying waterproofing membrane may remain in place. The asphalt wearing surface will likely need to be replaced every 10 to 15 years.

Deck Expansion Joints - Preventive maintenance of bridge deck expansion joints are vital to maintaining the serviceability and prolonging the life of a bridge. Preventive maintenance usually means cleaning the joint. Preventive maintenance is most effective if it begins when a bridge is new and continues throughout the service life. The objective of preventative maintenance for deck joints is keeping the seal securely in place and waterproof. The expansion joints on the bridge will likely need to be replaced every 10 to 15 years.

Concrete Crack and Spall Repairs - The exposed concrete surfaces of the superstructure and the substructure will likely experience additional deterioration such as cracking and spalling over time which will require crack and spall repairs. Repair to

concrete surfaces is accomplished by removing deteriorated or damaged concrete and placing new concrete material. This method is used to restore the integrity of concrete surfaces that have spalls, cracks, voids, etc. The first step in the repair of any type of deterioration in concrete is complete removal of all unsound concrete. No satisfactory repairs can be made until there is clean and sound concrete to which the new concrete can be bonded. The edge of a cut out area should be undercut for deep patches to help retain the new material. Effective bonding of the new to the old concrete is usually accomplished with a bonding material and is particularly important when deep cracks require a large volume of concrete to be replaced. A grout can also be used when the form for the concrete is so inaccessible that an epoxy material cannot be applied effectively. The exposed area can be sloshed liberally with grout just prior to placing the concrete. Concrete crack and spall repairs will likely be necessary at some future date which will be identified because of future biennial inspections.

Pile Jackets – The concrete piles that support the pier caps of this bridge will eventually show signs of cracking and spalling due to the saltwater environment. Jackets are the most common type of pile protection or repair. They are used for protection of all types of piles: concrete, steel, and timber. The jacket can be for protection from abrasion damage, for repair of section loss, or for both. If the jacket is for protection only, it could consist of a liner placed around the area to be protected with a cement or epoxy grout filler pumped into the space between the pile and the liner. If the jacket is intended to repair structural damage, the jacket will provide space for new reinforcement and the space between the liner and the old pile is filled with concrete. The liner is often a pre- molded fiberglass stay-in-place form; however, it could also be metal or fabric. Removable forms are also used, usually with reinforced concrete jackets. The biennial inspections will detect when the installation of pile jackets will be required.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

The cost to replace the bridge would be in the $5 million range assuming a square foot cost of $300. If no maintenance were performed, the useful life of the bridge would be reduced. If the preventative maintenance repairs discussed in Section 5 of this report are performed, this bridge could last for another 50 years or more. The recommended preventative maintenance repairs and estimated costs (in 2020 dollars) are summarized below:
Bridge cleaning, sealing, and painting in 10 years at $30,000
Replace asphalt wearing surface in 10 years at $75,000
Replace expansion joints in 10 years at $50,000

The CDD Board will need to determine how to finance the future cost of the maintenance repairs. Assuming a 3% rate of inflation, annual reserve savings of approximately
$18,000 would be required starting in 2022 to provide for the funds to accomplish these repairs in 2032.

The cost of follow up biennial bridge inspections would be $8,000 every 2 years. The timing and cost of the maintenance repairs would be evaluated and updated as part of each inspection.

Please contact me at 239-216-1370 if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully,
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Ralph Verrastro, PE Practice Leader - Bridges

TAB 1
SITE MAP

WHISKEY CREEK BRIDGE
Inspection Report

505 Whiskey Creek Drive, Marco Island, FL 34145

TAB 2
BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD REPORT

KISINGER CAMPO & ASSOCIATES CORP.

BRIDGE 10: Key Marco Bridge
, DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 1 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

BY: KCA	BRIDGE NAME: Key Marco Bridge OWNER: Key Marco CDD		YEAR BUILT: 1994
MAINTAINED BY: Key Marco COD	SECTION NO.: 03 000 000
. STRUCTURE lYPE: 5 Prestressed Concrete 01 Slab		M.P.: 0.000 LOCATION: 0.7 Mlle South of San Marco Rd. (CR-92)	ROUTE:	0000
SERVICE lYPE ON: Highway/Pedestrian		FACILllY CARRIED: Whiskey Creek Drive SERVTYPE UNDER: Waterway	FEATURE INTERSECTED:	Rookery Bay
0	THIS BRIDGE CONTAINS FRACTURE CRITICAL COMPONENTS
0	THIS BRIDGE IS SCOUR CRITICAL
0	THIS REPORT IDENTIFIES DEFICIENCIES INHICH REQUIRE PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION
0		FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE	D	STRUCTURALL y DEFICIENT TYPE OF INSPECTION:	Initial NBI
DATE FIELD INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED: ABOVE WATER:  7/26/2012	UNDERWATER: 7/19/2012

SMART FLAGS:
None

OVERALL NBI RATINGS:
DECK: 7 Good
SUPERSTRUCTURE: 7 Good
SUBSTRUCTURE:	7 Good
CHANNEL: 8 Very Good CULVERT: NIA (NBI)

FIELD PERSONNEL/ TITLE/ NUMBER

"'-.

INITIALS

O'Grady, John - Bridge Inspector (CBI #00344) (lead)		
Ross, John - Bl Tech		

Hoogland, Keith (Lead Diver) (C8I#00341)		
Kotsyuba, Taras V. (Diver)		
Young, Ryan C. (Diver)		

 REVIEWING BRIDGE I SPECTION SUPERVISOR:	

Crissey, David - Bridge Inspector (CBI #00321)		

 CONFIRMING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER:	
LoCicero, Thomas - PE (#31136) Kisinger Campo & Associates 9270 Bay Plaza Blvd, Suite 605 Certificate of Authorization #2317 Tampa, FL 33619
SIGNATURE: 	 DATE: 		

...........	•:;;;:;;:.0. ••

►

Kts1NGER CAMPO & Assoc1ATES CoRP.

-

--	---- -1.:ntJinccr,n  .. 111:..pccti<,u .. pl.11111,119

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 2 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

UNIT: 0 DECKS

Prestressed Concrete Slab	ELEM CATEGORY:	Decks/Slabs
ELEMENT/ENV: 99/3	17136sf.

CONDITION
STATE(5)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY
Repaired areas and/or potholes or impending potholes
and/or significant cracks and/or raveling or rutting exist	17136sf. Their combined area Is less than 2% of the deck area.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: The tops of the slab units are not visible due an overlay of asphalt. There Is one abandoned navigational light fixture attached to the undersides of Slab Units 9-1 and 9-9.

CS1 = DECK TOP: The asphalt surfacing over the slab unit joints has intermittent longitudinal cracks up to 1/16in. wide.
The asphalt surfacing over the bents with no expansion joints have roadway width transverse cracks up to 1/Bin. wide. Refer to photo 1 In the attached addendum.

DECK FASCIA: The grout coating on the east fascia in Span 1 Is flaking. Refer to photo 2 in the attached addendum.

The transverse post-tension ducts on the east fascla of Slab Units 10-9 and 11-9 are poorly patched. Refer to photo 3 in the attached addendum.

DECK UNDERSIDE: The west edge of Slab Unit 10-7 has a Sin. x 4In. x 1in. spall at Bent 11.

The east edge of Slab Unit 13-3 has a patch with minor shrinkage cracking and efflorescence, approximately 9ft. from Bent 14. Refer to photo 4 in the attached addendum.

RECOMMENDED REPAIRS:
Clean and seal the transverse cracks in the asphalt surfacing over the bents with no expansion jolnts. Repair the flaking grout coating on the east fascia in Span 1.
Repair the poorly patched transverse post-tension ducts on the east fascia of Slab Units 10-9 and 11-9.

K1s1NGERCAMPO& AssoclATES CoRP.

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 3 OF 14 INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

UNIT: 0 DECKS
ELEMENT/ENV: 301/3	Pourable Joint Seal	27lf.	ELEM CATEGORY:	Joints CONDITION
STATE (3)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

The element shows minimal deterioration. Adhesion is
sound with no signs of leakage. There are no cohesion	25If. cracks. The adjacent deck and/or header Is sound.

Minor adhesion and/or cohesion failures may be
present. Signs of seepage along the joint may be	2If. present. Joint may be slightly Impacted with debris.
Minor spells in the deck and/or headers may be present adjacent to the joint.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: This element represents the expansion joint over Abutment 1. The joints are not visible over Bents 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 1a, 12, and 13 due to an overlay of asphalt.
CS1 = Light accumulation of dirt and debris is present in the Joint.
CS2 = The concrete joint header has minor longitudinal cracks up to 1/32in. wide.
There are two delaminations up to 2ft. x 6In. in the concrete joint header in Lane 2 (east lane). Refer to photo 5 In the attached addendum.

RECOMMENDED REPAIRS:
Repair the two delaminations in Abutment 1 concrete joint header in Lane 2 (east lane).

KISINGEij CAMPO & As!IOCIATES CORP.

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge
DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 40F 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

ELEMENT/ENV: 302/3	Compression Joint Seal	346lf.	ELEM CATEGORY:	Joints
CONDITION STATE (3)	
DESCRIPTION	
QUANTITY	
1	The element shows minimal deterioration. Adhesion is		
	sound with no signs of leakage. There are no cohesion	341If.	
	cracks. The adjacent deck and/or header is sound. If		
	joint armored, there are no signs of anchorage		
	looseness.		
2	Signs of seepage along the joint may be present. There		
	may be small adhesion failures. The gland may show	5lf.	
	signs of abrasion or minor tearing. Significant debris in		
	all or part of the Joint. Minor spalls In the deck and/or		
	headers may be present adjacent to the joint. If joint is		
	armored, the anchorage has failed.		
ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: This element represents the expansion joints over Bents 4, 7, 9, 11 and Abutment 14. CS1 = There is light accumulation of dirt and debris present in the joints.
CS2 = The concrete joint headers have isolated spalls up to 7in. x 2in. x 1in. and minor longitudinal cracks up to 1/32in. wide.

&

KISINGER CAMPO	ASSOCIATES CORP.

pl:tnnin

--------.--------- --------- ·--  ---- ----- -------

cn91uL cr1U:J • ill!.pPCtion •

!!'r,•,.n: : "'1°•

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge
DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 6 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7126/2012

UNIT: 0 SUPERSTRUCTURE

ELEMENT/ENV: 333/3	Other Bridge Railing	1010lf.	ELEM CATEGORY:	Railing

CONDITION
STATE(3)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

This element shows llttle or no deterioration. There may be minor cracking, corrosion and/or other minor deterioration having no affect on strength or serviceability.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

10101f.

Note: This element represents the combination of steel rails and concrete posts. Light poles are attached to the top of the concrete posts at Bent 2 right side, Bent 4 left side, Bent 6 right side, Bent 8 left side, Bent 1O right side, Bent 12 left side and Abutment 14 right side.

l<JslijGER CAMPO & ASSOCIATES. CoRP,

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge
DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 6 OF14 INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

Y!i!.I:..2SUPERSTRUCTURE
ELEMENT/ENV: 204/3	PIS Cone Column	72ea.	ELEM CATEGORY:	Substructure CONDITION
STATE(4)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

The element shows little or no deterioration. There may	66ea. be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial
cracking but without affect on strength and/or serviceability.

Minor cracks, spalls and scaling may be present and	Sea. there may be exposed reinforcing with no evidence of
corrosion. There is no exposure of the prestress system.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: This element represents the prestressed concrete piles at the intermediate bents.
CS2 = The northwest comer of Pile 6-2 has a Sin. x 3in. x 3/4In. spall, 2-1/2ft. below the cap. The southwest comer of Pile 6-4 has a poorly patched spall, just below the cap.
The northeast comers of Piles 7-2 and 7-4 have spalls up to 17in. x 5in. x 3/4In., just above the marine growth.

The east face of Pile 9-6 has a 2ft. x 1Bin. delamination in an epoxy patch at the top of the marine growth, and vertical cracks up to 4ft. long x 1/32In. wide, extending up from the top of the marine growth in all four faces. Refer to photo 6 in the attached addendum.

The following was noted by the underwater inspectors:
Pile 7-1 has a 1Oft. x 3in. x 3/4in. spall in the northeast comer, starting at the cap.

RECOMMENDED REPAIRS:
Repair the delamination In the east face of Pile 9-6 at the top of the marine growth. Seal the vertical cracks in all four faces of Pile 9-6.

l<!SINGER CAMPO & AsSOCIATES CORP.
cn91nccr1n9 • 1nspcct,1Qn • pl;:1un1119 --- :o' !n,:--;;-

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge
DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 7 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE

ELEMENT/ENV: 216/3	R/Concrete Abutment	761f.	ELEM CATEGORY	Superstructure

CONDITION
STATE (4)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

The element shows little or no deterioration. There may	72If.
be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial cracking but without affect on strength and/or serviceability.

Minor cracks, spalls and scaling may be present but	4lf.
there is no exposed reinforcing or surface evidence of rebar corrosion.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

CS1 = Abutment 1 cap has a full height x up to 1/64In. wide vertical crack under Slab Unit 1-9.

CS2 = The top edge of Abutment 1 cap has spells up to 10in. x Sin. x 1in., under Slab Units 1-5, 1-6, 1-7 and 1-9.

KISINGER CAMPO & ASSOCIATES CoRP.

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge
DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: B OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

UNIT:0SUBSTRUCTURE

ELEMENT/ENV: 234/3	R/Concrete Cap	4521f.	ELEM CATEGORY	Superstructure

CONDITION
STATE (4)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

The element shows little or no deterioration. There may	452lf.
1	be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial cracking but without affect on strength and/or serviceability.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

No deficiencies noted.

KISINGER CAMPO &AsSOCIATES CORP.

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge DISTRICT: 01
UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE

PAGE: 9 OF 14 INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

ELEMENT/ENV:  580/3	Navigational Light System	1ea.	ELEM CATEGORY	Superstructure
CONDITION
STATE (4)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

Lights are operational, lenses are clean and not broken,	1ea.
1	there is no evidence of corrosion.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: This element represents the six navigational lights attached to the deck fascias along the left and right sides of
Span 9.

AsSOCIATES. CORP.

►

K1s1t-1GER CAMPO & 	
c119u1ccr,ng  • 1nspcc,:tion • 11ldn111119	!,";;.:;..•,; "!]"'

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 10 OF 14 INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE
ELEMENT/ENV: 396/3	Other Abut Slope Pro	2796sf.	ELEM CATEGORY	Substructure CONDITION
STATE (4)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

1	There is little or no deterioration. Surface defects only are in evidence. Random open joints may exits.

2796sf.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: This element represents the rock rubble slope protection at the four comers of the structure and along each abutment

No deficiencies noted.

KISINGER CAMPO & ASSOCIATES CORP.

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge DISTRICT: 01
UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE

PAGE: 11 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

ELEMENT/ENV: 290/3	Channel	1ea.	ELEM CATEGORY	Superstructure
CONDITION
STATE (4)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY

The channel is in good condition, channel banks are
1	protected or well vegetated, river control devices and embankment protection are not required or are in good condition.

1ea.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

The following was noted by the underwater inspectors:
There is a 5ft. high x 201n. square concrete pile stub in the channel, east of Pile 10-6.

There is a 6 long pile cutoff on the bottom of the channel, lying west to east, 2ft. east of Pile 11-6.

KlSI

G

R CAMPO & ASSOCIATES CORP.

-		
	cn91ncl'rtn!] • 1n:..pcc	t1on • pl.1nnt11CJ	:.:; !"...':!"11""	

N·-E

BRIDGE IC: Key Marco Bridge
DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 12 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

UNIT: 0 SUBSTRUCTURE

ELEMENT/ENV: 321/3	R/Conc Approach Slab	2ea.	ELEM CATEGORY	Other Elements

CONDITION
STA E {4)	 5\lPtJJ t settled af'!d shows no sigA of	QU W:ITY
deterioration other than superficial surface cracks.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Noto: The approach slabs are not visible due to an overlay of asphalt.

CS1 = The asphalt surface of the north approach slab has a slab length x 1/32in. wide diagonal crack in Lane 2 (east lane).

The asphalt surfacing has full roadway width x up to 1/32In. wide transverse cracks at each approach roadway/approach slab transition.

KISIN

SSOCIATES C

cng,11ccr1ng • tns.pcctu)n • pl.1n!l1ng

---	 GER CAMPO &A -

ORP,

;.;;;1"'.,•;;.,•"''

-

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 13 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

UNIT: 0 MISCELLANEIOUS
ELEMENT/ENV: 475/3	R/Conc Walls	60lf.	ELEM CATEGORY	Channel CONDITION
STATE (4)	DESCRIPTION	QUANTITY
1	The element shows little or no deterioration. There may	SOit.
be discoloration, efflorescence, and/or superficial cracking but without affect on strength and/or serviceability. Random open joints may exist.

ELEMENT INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: This element represents the retaining walls at the southeast, northwest and northeast comers of the structure. No deficiencies noted.

KiSINGER CAMPO & AsSOC!ATES CORP.

BRIDGE ID: Key Marco Bridge
DISTRICT: 01

PAGE: 14 OF 14
INSPECTION DATE: 7/26/2012

STRUCTURE NOTES:
BRIDGE OWNER: KEY MARCO CDD

Note: This structure was Inventoried from south to north. Asphalt thickness is approximately 2in.

INSPECTION NOTES:

Note: A load rating analysis was not performed for this structure. Therefore, the Bridge Load Rating Information sections in the CIDR will remain blank.
The following elements were Inspected underwater by the divers:
204 PIS Concrete Column - Bents 7 through 11 with six 20in. concrete piling 290 Channel - Channel bottom and channel banks

KISINGER CAMFO & AssOCIATES CORP.

BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY DATA REPORT

Page 1 of 3

Structure ID: Key Marco Bridge
I 4 Description I

Structure Unit Identification
Bridge/Unit ID:	Key Marco Bridge

UNIT 0

Structure Unit Type and Material
Struct Material (43)	Prestressed Concrete

Desaiptlon:
Type: NBI Unit Flag Curb/Sidewalk (50)

Spans 1 thru 13 Main Span
Main Left 5.3 ft

Approach D
Right 2.3 ft

Design Type  Slab
Deck Type (107) Precast Panel Surface (108) 8 Bituminous
Membrane  None

Deck Width (52)  34.1 ft
Bridge Median (33)  No median

Deck Protection  None
Skew (34)  25 deg

Roadway Identification	Roadway Traffic and Accidents

NBI Structure No (8)	Key Marco Bridge		Lanes (28)  2	Medians  0	Speed	20mph	
Position/Prefix (5)	Route On Structure		ADT Class	Class 4		
Kind Hwy (Rte Prefix)	Other		Recent ADT (29)	720	Year(30)	2012	
Design Level of Service	Service		Future ADT (114)	864	Year ( 115)	2032	
Route Number/Suffix	00001Not applicable		Truck% ADT	2%		
Feature Intersect (6)
Critical Facility	Rookery Bay
Not Defense - crit		Detour Length (19)
Detour Speed	99 miles
-1	Mph		
Facility Carried (7)	Whiskey Creek Drive		Accident Count	-1	Rate	-1	
Mlle Point (11)	0					
Latitude (16)	25d55'31.24"	Long (17)	81d40'27.28"				

Roadway Classification
Nat Hwy Sys (104)  0 Not on NHS National base Net (12)  Not on Base Network

Roadway Clearances
Vertical (10)  99.99 ft
Horiz. (47)	24.1 ft

Appr. Road (32)  26.4 ft
Roadway (51)	24.1 ft

LRS Inventory Rte (13a)  03 000 000
Functional Class (26)  19 Urban Collector Ellglble for Federal Aid ?  No

D

Defense Hwy (100)  0 Not a STRAHNET hwy Direction of Traffic (102) 2 way traffic
Critical Travel Route

Truck Networl< (110)  0 Not part of natl netwo Toll Facility (20)  3 On free road

D

Fed. Lands Hwy (105)  0 NIA (NBI)
School Bus Route Transit Route D

KISINGER CAMP0 & IATE Crni:e,
BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY DATA REPORT

Page 2 of 3

Structure ID: Key Marco Bridge Structure Identification
AdmlnArea	Nol localed In area
District (2)  01
County (3)	(03) - Collier Place Code (4)  No city Involved
Location (9)	0.7 Mlle South of San Marco Road (CR-92) Border Br St/Reg (98)  Not Applicable	Share  0% Border Struct No (99)
FIPS Stale/Region (1)  Florida	Region	4-Allanta
NBIS Bridge Len (112) Meets NBI Length Parallel Structure (101) No II bridge exists Temp. Structure (103)  Not Appncable
Mainl Resp, (21)  Key Marco CDD
0Nner(22) Key Marco CDD Historic Slgnif. (37)  Not eligible for NRHP
I Appraisal  j
Structure Appraisal
Open/Posted/Closed (41) Open, Analysis not complete Deck Geometry (68) Not Calculated
Underclearances (69)  N-Not Applicable
Approach Alignment (72)  8 No Speed Red Thru Curv Bridge Ralllngs (36a)  O Substandard
Transitions (36b) O Substandard Approach Guardrail (36c)  Not Applicable
Approach Guardrail ends (36d)  Not Applicable Scour Critical (113)  5 stable w/ln footing

Geometrics
Spans in Main Unit (45)  13
Approach Spans (46) 0 Length of Max Span (48)  39 ft
Structure Length (49)	502.5 ft
Deck Area  17136 sq. ft.
Structure Flared (35)  No flare

Age and Service
Year Built (27)  1994
Year Reconstructed (106)  0
Type of Service On (42a)	5 Highway - Pedestrian Under (42b)	Waterway
Fracture Critical Details  Not Applicable

Navigation Data
Navigation Control (38) Permit Not Required Nav Vertical Cir (39) 0 fl
Nav Horizontal Cir (40)  Oft
Min Vert Lift Cir (116)  O ft
Pier Protection (111)  Not Required

NBI Condition Rating
Sufficiency Rating Not Calculated Structural Eval (67)  Not Calculated
Deficiency	Not Calculated

Minimum Vertical Clearance	Minimum Lateral Underclearanca

Over Structure (53)  99.99 ft
Under (reference) (54a)  Feature not a hwy or RR Under (54b) Oft

Reference (55a) Right Side (55b)
Left Side
(56)

Feature not hwy or RR
0 ft
0 ft

Load Rating
Design Load (31)
Rating Date Posting (70)

I 6 Schedule  I
Current Inspection

Initials

Operating Type (63)
Operating Rating (64)
Inventory Type (65)
Inventory Rating (66)

Next Inspection Data

Tons Tons

Scheduled

Inspection Date		7/26/2012 Inspector	John O'Grady
Primary Type  Regular NBI
Review Required
Inspection Types

NBI  7/26/2012
Element	7/26/2012 Fracture Critical
Underwater	7/26/2012
Oth@r Special

Performed

NBI	Element	Fracture Critical D	Underwater	Other Special O

KISINGER CAMPO & AssOCIATES CORP,

BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY DATA REPORT

Page 3 of 3

Structure ID: Key Marco Bridge

D

Inspection Intervals	Required (92)
Fracture Critical

Underwater Other Special D

Frequency (92)
mos

24 mos mos

Last Date (93)	lnsgectlon Resources

Crew Hours	4
Flagger Hours  a
7/19/2012		Helper Hours 0 Snooper Hours 0 Spacial Craw Hours	3
Special Equipment Hours  0

NBI

24  mos	(91)

7/26/2012 (90)

5 Custom

General Bridge Information
Parallel Bridge Seq N/A Channel Depth 16.7 ft
Radio Freq
P11one Number (000) 000-0000 Exception Date
Exception Type Unknov.,,

Bridge Rall 1
Bridge Rall 2 Electrical Devices Culvert Type Maintenance Yard

Combination of materials not defined Not applicable-No Rall
Roadway lighting only Not Applicable
0

Bridge Load Rating Information
Govr. Span Length	ft	Single Unit Truck 2 Axles	tons	
L-Ratlng Origination		Single Unit Truck 3 Axles	tons	
Load Rating Date		Single Unit Truck 4 Axles	tons	
Method Calculation Load Dist Factor Impact Factor Design Method Design Measure
Recommended Single Unit	

tons	Combination Unit Truck 3 Axles Combination Unit Truck 4 Axles Combination Unit Truck 5 Axles
Truck Trailer 5 Axles Posting Weight
Posting Slngle Unit	tons tons tons tons tons
tons	
Recommended Combination	tons	Posting Combination Unit	tons	
Recommended Tandem	tons	Posting Tandem Unit	tons	

Bridge Scour and Storm Information
Pile Driving Record	Unknown Foundation Type Unkno'Ml
Mode of Flow Tidal
Rating Scour Eval Low Risk Highest Scour Eval Unknown

Scour Recommended I	Unknown Scour Recommended II Unknown Scour Recommended Ill	Unknown Scour Elevation	Unknown
Action Elevation	Unknown

1 Condition

NBI Rating
Deck (58)	7 Good
Superstructure (59)  7 Good
Substructure (60) 7 Good
ChaMel (61)	7 Good

Culvert (62) Not Applicable Waterway (71) 8 - Equal Desirable

0

Unrepalred Spalls
Review Required

JGER CAMPO & ASSOCIATES Co .

ADDENDUM
Bridge ID: Key Marco Bridge	Inspection Date: 7/26/12

PHOTO SECTION

•

Element	- Typical transverse	in bents with no expansion joints

coating flaking on the east fascia in Span 1

mER CAMPO& Assoc1Ares Co
J	• l lJ If'._. o•t111'J •  ti •II•••• f I • ••  • fl J l th  111  lj 	1	1	•;:, ,"', :,r'" •

ADDENDUM

Bridge ID: Key Marco Bridge	Inspection Date: 7/26/12

PHOTO SECTION

Element	Poorly patched post-tension duct on the east fascia of Slab Unit 11-9

l
Photo #f	Element 99 - Patch with shrinkage cracking and efflorescence on
the underside of Slab Unit 13-3 at the east edge

K	mER CAMPO & Assoc1ATES CoR

ADDENDUM

Bridge ID: Key Marco Bridge	Inspection Date:  7/26/12
PHOTO SECTION

Delamination in the east face
top of the marine growth (note the vertical cracks)

-,_\'f·t.

K:	GER CAMPO & ASSOCIATES COR(

ADDENDUM

Bridge ID: Key Marco Bridge	lnapectlon Date: l.12.§!12..

SCOUR EVALUATION
KEY MARCO BRIDGE COMPAAATlVE SOUNDINGS

			ufui-,;r,9	L::,.	r0/31/21...	
		07/26/12	("_.t,,.,,.,.	01/11 /17					
				l◊.O	_,,..,_,
_,,..,_..,_	,'q,(	;r15	q,,(o	
Abutm,m 1		10.3	1+n						
88'1:2		14.1	+(). I	IA	f;			(?	t '3.	
Bent 3		15.5	-r, I	I"·	h	-.,-... (	1,,5A,c;.-	·+n,'>	•s.	
8ent4		16-5	- (.  l	! /.  (..	-p	2.		("'I	I [d •  i;	
Bent S		17.2 -	-tJ -	1·1. 5	,-b	I	,1-., .d...	o.1	Ii,	i.,	
Bent&		18.4	. :,, 2	I i'§, !_,	1-'-l>. I	/,9,"'7	+..o.,.2.		·	4	
Sent 7		21.0	0	z..t.o	. C>	7..(,0			'> "'.  C,	
Bents		32.0	n	12.c,	f>	Sl-z. o	•D,	'?.2, '	
Ben!9		36.0	+O. I	3i...,.	I'\	"2..C.9	'· <_	">7,		
Bent 10		36.2	-tJ. (-,	).;:; {I	1--4- ./	1cc,	-1,n	.?. "' '		
a.nt 11		28.6	+<>,31	7..,(;, _...,	·o	2'-',3	-o.1..	2.lo.,:)	
Bem 12		18.B	0	If:?-
,-,  ,	0	tea.a	+O,	{t'J	I <;I,, 2.	
Bent 13		17.4	;_,17 '2		-0,	I	17.,,--	"I, c;	\1,(]	
Ab.ltmenl 1'4		10.3	+-e <'?	\. 0	,-,-,	0	JO..D	.,.	,, l	q  -"'	

LEFT SIDE

jw/L at Bent 9	19.3

				01/11/17	t::...	(j/t I	6	ioh 1/2	
		07/26112	Chance						
				Cf.]	1.t- (	q,z...	-'- \.?J	7,4	
Abu!mant 1		9.1	0						
Bent 2		13.0	('i	t3 n	,.., I	I .	q	+o,	l	\'3, 0	
Sent 3		1ti.0	r,	l.,. ()	("")	t,s:;:;0	+..... \	14	c;		
Bent<!		16.0	r·,	Ii,. (_i	r-.		+o, I	I '3 •	._		
ltll'ITT,--		16.9	o.3	!·1  ,,.,	'"". I	,-,.1	'!"l"l,:,,	I /,.	' ..,	
Bents		,ao	-D. 2.	I .'..!..	-	2-	JJ>:t.o		I 0,	, C		
Sem7		21.S	-r,.-:;	:::'..l. 5	-.7	-Z-a..,I"."'		'Z.-I• .		
Ben: 8		31,0	(')	< 1. 0	CJ					
8ent9		36.1	'•."). C:	s: . L.	/')	-z.c::r_	-{).'2..	'35.	
eant 10		36.0	,w,'	,; 1	t-,I	·rJ	-1,5	3 7,	C::.,	
Bent 11		26.2	_r, y._	-1. /?	.	2..	-::>/=B	'"'Ii	L L '->	
Bent 12	\	18.5	_r,_ '3	(8 ,i?	C	I '2. t:;i.	-..o,3	IQ,,'>	
Bent 13	\	17.6	-0	(7R	i-,	I	I,	"7	.,,.\		
AbU(ment 14		10.1		/C>.O	,...• l	9.		.., I			

RIGHT SIDE

..

jWIL at 811'119		19.3
Note: + • Aggradatlon
- " OllgflKlatlon
Rlllllthl! Cflenllll PlOtl!	Not To Scale.
Arry \iertlcal Clr.ature Of Datum Point Is Hot Rallecllw!
n Plot.
The -ertlne andmLldlfne measinrnema. In 11frsrence to the lop of lh• blriterwaffa, an, Pl'CMIIG forfullllW com-paisat. Ali maa&uremants are in fall.

Special Underwater Bridge Inspection Report VOLKERT, INC.
for
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NBI Structure ID. (8): Key Marco Bridge	Underwater Date (93):	10/31/22
Structure/Roadway Identification:	Underwater Inspection Details:
District (2):	01	Special Crew Hours:	3.0
County (3):	Collier		Max. Depth:	17ft. at Bent 10 Feature Intersected (6):	Key Marco Bridge	Type of Dive Insp.:	Level II (SCUBA)
Facility Carried (7):	Type of Boat Used:	N/A
Water Type/Marine Growth:	Salt – Barnacles
Inspection Personnel:
Field Personnel:	Title	P.E./C.B.I. No.:	Duty:	Signature:
Hoogland, Keith S.	SUCBI	00341/Lead	Dive

Popp, Jacob J.	AUBI	Dive

Redden, Michael D.	AUBI	Tend

8290 CHANNEL	1 EA. = CS-2: 1EA.

Deficiencies confirmed from Routine inspection (07/19/2012):

CS-2 9140 East of Pile 10-6 there is a 5ft. high 20in. square concrete pile stub. (1EA) NOTE: The previously reported cut-off pile 24in. east of Pile 11-6 was no longer present.

226 PRE CONC PILE	30 EA. = CS-1: 27EA.	CS-3: 3EA.
NOTE: This element represents the six 20in. piles at each of Bents 7 through 11. Deficiencies confirmed from Routine inspection (08/25/2021):
CS-3 1080 Pile 7-1, northeast corner at cap has a spall, 10ft. H x 3in. W x 3/4in. D. (1EA)

CS-3 1080 Pile 7-4, northeast corner 6ft. 4in. below cap has a spall, 17in. H x 3in. W x 3/4in. D. (1EA)

CS-3 1110 Pile 9-6, all faces from splice up have intermittent vertical cracks, up to 4ft. L x 1/16in. W – INCREASE. (1EA) Pile 9-6, all faces at the top of the marine growth have epoxy wrapped splice.

Cleaning Log: Random areas.

INSPECTION NOTES: Divers inspected Channel and Bents 7 through 11 each with six 20in. concrete piles.
STRUCTURE NOTES: Structure inventoried south to north.

PHOTO LOG:
No. 1: Structure ID.
No. 2: West elevation
No. 3: Pile 9-6 east face, vertical crack No. 4: Pile 7-1 NE corner, spall

This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections 119.071(3)(a) and 119.071(3)(b), Florida Statutes.
(C2\mydoc\bridgereports\Dams/Specials_KCI_KeyMarco_SPECIAL_10-31-22_UW)	Page 1 of 1

Key Marco Diving Inspection Photos	10/31/2022

Photo 1	Photo 2

Photo 3	Photo 4

TAB 3
BRIDGE INSPECTION PHOTOGRAPHS

Inspection Photographs	
Project: Whiskey Creek Drive Bridge	
Client: Hole Montes	
Date:	10/31/2022	

 	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															
Photo 1 - Elevation View	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

Photo 2 - South Approach (looking north)	

Inspection Photographs	
Project: Whiskey Creek Drive Bridge	
Client: Hole Montes	
Date:	10/31/2022	

 	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															
Photo 3 - North Approach (looking south)	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

Photo 4 - Minor joint header cracking, Abutment 1	

Inspection Photographs	
Project: Whiskey Creek Drive Bridge	
Client: Hole Montes	
Date:	10/31/2022	

 	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															
Photo 5 - Typical joint at rail columns (future maintenance)	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

Photo 6 - Minor longitudinal asphalt cracks, Span 9	

Inspection Photographs	
Project: Whiskey Creek Drive Bridge	
Client: Hole Montes	
Date:	10/31/2022	

 	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															
Photo 7 - Staining due to leakage at joints, End Bent 14	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

Photo 8 - Typical pile spall patch	

Inspection Photographs	
Project: Whiskey Creek Drive Bridge	
Client: Hole Montes	
Date:	10/31/2022	

 	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															
Photo 9 - Slab unit 13-3, minor shrinkage cracks with efflorescence	

																															

																															

																															

																															

																															

Photo 10 - Under bridge, typical	

RESOLUTION 2023-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CANVASSING AND CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF THE LANDOWNERS ELECTION OF SUPERVISORS FOR KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT HELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.006, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE

WHEREAS, based upon records made available to Key Marco Community Development District (the "District"), the District currently has less than 250 qualified electors in the District; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 190.006(3), Florida Statutes, the District must hold a landowners' election to fill the seats of those Supervisors whose terms are expiring; and

WHEREAS, the District called a landowners' meeting for the purpose of holding such a landowners' election; and
WHEREAS, following proper publication of notice thereof, such landowners' meeting was held November 16, 2022, at which the below recited persons were duly elected by virtue of the votes cast in his/her favor; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution canvasses the votes, and declares and certifies the results of said election.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

Section 1.	Vote Tabulation/Election Results. The following persons are found, certified, and declared to have been duly elected as Supervisors of and for the District, having been elected by the votes cast in his/her favor as shown:

\\f\o.r ?:eth s	-nt1-

L--l f'fl
Terr\	

	v_Votes

Votes Votes

Section 2.	Terms. In accordance with said Section 190.006, Florida Statutes, and by virtue of the number of votes cast for the respective Supervisors, they are declared to have been elected for the
following term of office:

1J\0- ,--\ ?-,e.\-h. 'S'-'heI.	, l-1.--

L-t nY\

four (4) year term four (4) year term two (2) year term

Section 3.  Commencement of Terms. The terms of office set forth in Section 2 shall commence immediately upon the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 4.  Severability. If any section or part of a section of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional, the validity, force and effect of any other section or part of a section of this Resolution shall not thereby be affected or impaired unless it clearly appears that such other section or part of a section of this Resolution is wholly or necessarily dependent upon the section or part of a section so held to be invalid or unconstitutional, it being expressly found and declared that the remainder of this Resolution would have been adopted despite the invalidity of such section or part of such section.

Section 5.  Conflicts. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, superseded and repealed.

Section 6.
its adoption.

Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Key Marco Community Development District this 16th day of November, 2022.

Attest:	KEY MARCO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	

2

RESOLUTION 2023-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT RE-DESIGNATING THE OFFICERS OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of Key Marco Community Development District ("District") previously designated the officers of the District; and

WHEREAS, the Board now desires to re-designate and/or appoint certain persons to the offices specified in this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Section 1.
offices shown:

Chair Vice Chair Treasurer
Secretary

Designation of Officers.	The following persons are appointed to the
 f\ M Be+h 'Sche l	 \-L
le<Jc..f\ne.,, ke(\D s
D Gl'{ n G\ 	0 h \b"c  h_
		6 	h( 14-=  c o.rW­

Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary

Ter, '-  s+u--11+o1
-:Sohr}	E S1Po s i+ o
L:tnn Don1c:J\\Cl

Section 2.	Rescission of Prior Designations.  All prior officer designations of the
Board that are inconsistent with the designations set forth above are hereby rescinded.

Section 3.  Severability. If any section or part of a section of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional, the validity, force and effect of any other section or part of a
section of this Resolution shall not thereby be affected or impaired unless it clearly appears that such other section or part of a section of this Resolution is wholly or necessarily dependent upon the section or part of a section so held to be invalid or unconstitutional, it being expressly found and declared that the remainder of this Resolution would have been adopted despite the invalidity of such section or part of such section.

Section 4.	Conflicts. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, superseded and repealed.

Section 5.
its adoption.

Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Key Marco Community Development District this 16th day of November, 2022.

Attest:

KEY MARCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Joshua Carter, Secretary

2